Compare
Castlemaine vs Portland
Urban Area comparison ≈ 271 km apart · Castlemaine profile · Portland profile
Castlemaine Portland
Castlemaine and Portland are two small Victorian towns with distinct professional and educational profiles. Castlemaine has a far more qualified workforce, with 30.5% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 11.4% in Portland. This is consistent with the same area having far more people working from home (25.8% versus 6.1%) and a far higher share of people who finished Year 12. Castlemaine also offers a more walkable environment, with 90.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park, compared to 55.0% in Portland.
Both towns share a nearly identical typical weekly household income of $1,200. They also have very similar proportions of people who use another language at home and those providing unpaid care. While they share these commonalities, some gaps are widening; for example, the difference in university qualifications and the number of people working from home have both grown since 2011. Residents in both areas are far older than the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,778
- First area, 2016: 12,250
- First area, 2021: 11,352
- Second area, 2011: 16,674
- Second area, 2016: 10,800
- Second area, 2021: 11,230
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Castlemaine: 1.5% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in Portland: 1.1% males, 2.0% females
- 80–84 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Portland: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 3.2% females; 75–79 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Castlemaine: 3.3% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Portland: 3.5% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Castlemaine: 3.9% males, 4.5% females; 65–69 in Portland: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Castlemaine: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 60–64 in Portland: 3.8% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Portland: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Castlemaine: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Portland: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Portland: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Portland: 2.4% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Castlemaine: 3.0% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Portland: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 1.1% females; 20–24 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Portland: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Castlemaine: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Portland: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Portland: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Portland: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $498
- First area, 2016: $577
- First area, 2021: $683
- Second area, 2011: $403
- Second area, 2016: $534
- Second area, 2021: $631
- First area, 2011: $905
- First area, 2016: $1,055
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2011: $770
- Second area, 2016: $1,050
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: $1,172
- First area, 2016: $1,399
- First area, 2021: $1,676
- Second area, 2011: $1,032
- Second area, 2016: $1,345
- Second area, 2021: $1,551
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $215
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,296
- First area, 2016: $1,270
- First area, 2021: $1,408
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,200
- Second area, 2021: $1,105
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Castlemaine with nearby areas
Compare Portland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Castlemaine vs Portland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2005/castlemaine/vs/2014/portland