Compare
Gisborne vs Portland
Urban Area comparison ≈ 279 km apart · Gisborne profile · Portland profile
Gisborne Portland
Gisborne and Portland are two Victorian areas with very different economic profiles. Gisborne is a wealthier area where the typical weekly household income is $2,293, far higher than the $1,200 typical in Portland. This is consistent with a more highly qualified workforce; 27.3% of adults in Gisborne hold a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 11.4% in Portland. Consequently, Gisborne has a much higher share of people working from home (26.8% versus 6.1%) and a higher proportion of children under 15.
Both areas are very similar in their levels of religious affiliation, with around 49% of people in each area reporting no religion. While they share this trait, other gaps have changed over time. The difference in weekly household income has widened since 2011, as has the gap in typical home-loan payments, which are far higher in Gisborne. Meanwhile, the gap in the number of people living alone has narrowed, though it remains far higher in Portland, where the typical resident is also older.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 18,013
- First area, 2016: 16,250
- First area, 2021: 22,200
- Second area, 2011: 16,674
- Second area, 2016: 10,800
- Second area, 2021: 11,230
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gisborne: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Portland: 1.1% males, 2.0% females
- 80–84 in Gisborne: 0.9% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Portland: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Gisborne: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Gisborne: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Portland: 3.5% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Gisborne: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Portland: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Gisborne: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Portland: 3.8% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Gisborne: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 55–59 in Portland: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Gisborne: 3.6% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Portland: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Gisborne: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Portland: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Gisborne: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Gisborne: 2.9% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Portland: 2.4% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Gisborne: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 30–34 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Gisborne: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Portland: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Gisborne: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Gisborne: 3.8% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Portland: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Gisborne: 4.2% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Portland: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Gisborne: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Portland: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Gisborne: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Portland: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $658
- First area, 2016: $621
- First area, 2021: $936
- Second area, 2011: $403
- Second area, 2016: $534
- Second area, 2021: $631
- First area, 2011: $1,659
- First area, 2016: $1,102
- First area, 2021: $2,293
- Second area, 2011: $770
- Second area, 2016: $1,050
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: $1,857
- First area, 2016: $1,412
- First area, 2021: $2,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,032
- Second area, 2016: $1,345
- Second area, 2021: $1,551
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $420
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,900
- First area, 2016: $1,200
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,200
- Second area, 2021: $1,105
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Gisborne with nearby areas
Compare Portland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gisborne vs Portland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2009/gisborne/vs/2014/portland