Compare
Castlemaine vs Gisborne
Urban Area comparison ≈ 53 km apart · Castlemaine profile · Gisborne profile
Castlemaine Gisborne
Gisborne and Castlemaine are both Victorian regional centres, but they have very different profiles. Gisborne is a wealthier area where the typical weekly household income is $2,293, and 34.1% of homes earn over $3,000 a week. It is geared toward families, with 21.5% of people under 15 and 90.7% of homes having three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Castlemaine is far older, with a typical resident aged 50 and 29.2% of the population aged 65 or over. It is also more affordable, with a typical weekly household income of $1,200.
Everyday life in both places shares some common ground, as they have similar levels of people born overseas (around 13%) and nearly identical unemployment rates. However, the gap between them is widening in several areas; the difference in typical incomes has grown since 2011, and residents in Castlemaine are now far older than those in Gisborne compared to a decade ago. While Gisborne has more high earners, Castlemaine is much more walkable, with far more homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and public transport.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,778
- First area, 2016: 12,250
- First area, 2021: 11,352
- Second area, 2011: 18,013
- Second area, 2016: 16,250
- Second area, 2021: 22,200
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Castlemaine: 1.5% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in Gisborne: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Gisborne: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 3.2% females; 75–79 in Gisborne: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Castlemaine: 3.3% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Gisborne: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Castlemaine: 3.9% males, 4.5% females; 65–69 in Gisborne: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Castlemaine: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 60–64 in Gisborne: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Gisborne: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Castlemaine: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Gisborne: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Gisborne: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Gisborne: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Gisborne: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Castlemaine: 3.0% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Gisborne: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Gisborne: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 1.1% females; 20–24 in Gisborne: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Gisborne: 3.8% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Castlemaine: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Gisborne: 4.2% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Gisborne: 4.1% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Gisborne: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $498
- First area, 2016: $577
- First area, 2021: $683
- Second area, 2011: $658
- Second area, 2016: $621
- Second area, 2021: $936
- First area, 2011: $905
- First area, 2016: $1,055
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2011: $1,659
- Second area, 2016: $1,102
- Second area, 2021: $2,293
- First area, 2011: $1,172
- First area, 2016: $1,399
- First area, 2021: $1,676
- Second area, 2011: $1,857
- Second area, 2016: $1,412
- Second area, 2021: $2,625
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $215
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $1,296
- First area, 2016: $1,270
- First area, 2021: $1,408
- Second area, 2011: $1,900
- Second area, 2016: $1,200
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Castlemaine with nearby areas
Compare Gisborne with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Castlemaine vs Gisborne [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2005/castlemaine/vs/2009/gisborne