Compare
Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Castlemaine
Urban Area comparison ≈ 109 km apart · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile · Castlemaine profile
Not in any Significant Urban Area Castlemaine
Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) and Castlemaine are two very different Victorian places. Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) is much more spread out, with a higher share of homes having three or more bedrooms (80.4%) and a higher percentage of people working full-time (55.3%). In contrast, Castlemaine is more concentrated and walkable, with 30.5% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher and 59.5% of people reporting no religion. Castlemaine also has better access to amenities, with 73.4% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport compared to 41.7% in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.).
The gap in home ownership is widening, as the difference in the share of three-bedroom homes has grown to 11 points since 2011. Despite this, the two areas share a very similar economic profile, with typical weekly personal incomes around $680 and almost identical rates of people providing unpaid care. Both areas also have similar proportions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents and people who use a language other than English at home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 693,577
- First area, 2016: 689,078
- First area, 2021: 716,050
- Second area, 2011: 11,778
- Second area, 2016: 12,250
- Second area, 2021: 11,352
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 50 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Castlemaine: 1.5% males, 2.7% females
- 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 2.2% females
- 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 3.2% females
- 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Castlemaine: 3.3% males, 4.0% females
- 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Castlemaine: 3.9% males, 4.5% females
- 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Castlemaine: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Castlemaine: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Castlemaine: 3.0% males, 2.3% females
- 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 1.1% females
- 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Castlemaine: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $476
- First area, 2016: $553
- First area, 2021: $680
- Second area, 2011: $498
- Second area, 2016: $577
- Second area, 2021: $683
- First area, 2011: $920
- First area, 2016: $1,086
- First area, 2021: $1,331
- Second area, 2011: $905
- Second area, 2016: $1,055
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: $1,158
- First area, 2016: $1,367
- First area, 2021: $1,728
- Second area, 2011: $1,172
- Second area, 2016: $1,399
- Second area, 2021: $1,676
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $215
- Second area, 2021: $310
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,387
- Second area, 2011: $1,296
- Second area, 2016: $1,270
- Second area, 2021: $1,408
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Compare Castlemaine with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Castlemaine [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area/vs/2005/castlemaine