Compare
Portland vs Mount Gambier
Urban Area comparison ≈ 93 km apart · Portland profile · Mount Gambier profile
Portland Mount Gambier
Mount Gambier and Portland are regional hubs located about 93 km apart in different states. Mount Gambier is more walkable, with far more homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (73.9% vs 47.2%), health services (56.1% vs 31.1%) and parks (86.8% vs 55.0%). Portland is older, with a typical resident aged 47 compared to 41 in Mount Gambier, and has a far higher share of detached houses at 89.3%. Mount Gambier also has a higher share of people working or looking for work (60.0% vs 53.0%) and a slightly higher typical weekly personal income of $713.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people who provide unpaid care. They also share similar levels of university qualifications, with about 11% of adults in both places holding a bachelor degree or higher. While Portland has seen more people move into outright home ownership, the gap between the two areas in the proportion of adults working or looking for work has narrowed since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 16,674
- First area, 2016: 10,800
- First area, 2021: 11,230
- Second area, 2011: 27,756
- Second area, 2016: 28,684
- Second area, 2021: 29,446
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Portland: 1.1% males, 2.0% females; 85+ in Mount Gambier: 1.1% males, 1.7% females
- 80–84 in Portland: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Mount Gambier: 1.3% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Mount Gambier: 1.7% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Portland: 3.5% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Mount Gambier: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Portland: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 65–69 in Mount Gambier: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Portland: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Mount Gambier: 2.9% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Portland: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Mount Gambier: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Portland: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Mount Gambier: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Portland: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Mount Gambier: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Mount Gambier: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Portland: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Mount Gambier: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Mount Gambier: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Portland: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Mount Gambier: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Mount Gambier: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Portland: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Mount Gambier: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Portland: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Mount Gambier: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Portland: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Mount Gambier: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Portland: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Mount Gambier: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $403
- First area, 2016: $534
- First area, 2021: $631
- Second area, 2011: $513
- Second area, 2016: $599
- Second area, 2021: $713
- First area, 2011: $770
- First area, 2016: $1,050
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2011: $928
- Second area, 2016: $1,087
- Second area, 2021: $1,280
- First area, 2011: $1,032
- First area, 2016: $1,345
- First area, 2021: $1,551
- Second area, 2011: $1,210
- Second area, 2016: $1,416
- Second area, 2021: $1,735
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $195
- Second area, 2021: $220
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,200
- First area, 2021: $1,105
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,196
- Second area, 2021: $1,170
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Portland with nearby areas
Compare Mount Gambier with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Portland vs Mount Gambier [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2014/portland/vs/4002/mount-gambier