Compare
Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Portland
Urban Area comparison ≈ 247 km apart · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile · Portland profile
Not in any Significant Urban Area Portland
Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) and Portland are two Victorian regions with very different layouts. Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) is mostly car-dependent and has a higher share of people working from home at 17.2%. In contrast, Portland is somewhat walkable, with a much higher share of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport (80.7% compared to 41.7%) and more houses within a 15-minute walk of a school. Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) also has a higher proportion of residents with a bachelor degree or higher (16.0% versus 11.4%).
The gap in people working from home has widened since 2011, and they now share several other similarities. Both areas have the same share of people aged 65 and over (24.8%) and very similar typical weekly rents of $250. Their typical personal incomes are also close, at $680 in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) and $631 in Portland. This suggests that while their urban layouts and work patterns differ, the day-to-day cost of living and age profile are very similar.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 693,577
- First area, 2016: 689,078
- First area, 2021: 716,050
- Second area, 2011: 16,674
- Second area, 2016: 10,800
- Second area, 2021: 11,230
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Portland: 1.1% males, 2.0% females
- 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Portland: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Portland: 3.5% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Portland: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Portland: 3.8% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Portland: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Portland: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Portland: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Portland: 2.4% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Portland: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Portland: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Portland: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Portland: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Portland: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $476
- First area, 2016: $553
- First area, 2021: $680
- Second area, 2011: $403
- Second area, 2016: $534
- Second area, 2021: $631
- First area, 2011: $920
- First area, 2016: $1,086
- First area, 2021: $1,331
- Second area, 2011: $770
- Second area, 2016: $1,050
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: $1,158
- First area, 2016: $1,367
- First area, 2021: $1,728
- Second area, 2011: $1,032
- Second area, 2016: $1,345
- Second area, 2021: $1,551
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,387
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,200
- Second area, 2021: $1,105
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Compare Portland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Portland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area/vs/2014/portland