Compare
Castlemaine vs Echuca - Moama
Urban Area comparison ≈ 118 km apart · Castlemaine profile · Echuca - Moama profile
Castlemaine Echuca - Moama
Echuca - Moama and Castlemaine are both regional Victorian areas with older populations, but they differ sharply in their work and education profiles. Castlemaine has a much more qualified workforce, with 30.5% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 14.1% in Echuca - Moama. This is reflected in how people work; 25.8% of Castlemaine residents work from home, while only 8.7% do so in Echuca - Moama. In contrast, Echuca - Moama is far more welcoming to newcomers, with 16.3% of residents being recent overseas arrivals compared to just 4.8% in Castlemaine.
These two areas share very similar daily finances, with typical weekly personal incomes sitting at $705 in Echuca - Moama and $683 in Castlemaine. While they are alike in their earnings and health profiles, the social gaps between them are growing. The difference in religious views has widened significantly since 2011, with no religion now far higher in Castlemaine at 59.5% compared to 41.9% in Echuca - Moama.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,778
- First area, 2016: 12,250
- First area, 2021: 11,352
- Second area, 2011: 19,309
- Second area, 2016: 247,459
- Second area, 2021: 22,568
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Castlemaine: 1.5% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in Echuca - Moama: 1.3% males, 2.1% females
- 80–84 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Echuca - Moama: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 75–79 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 3.2% females; 75–79 in Echuca - Moama: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 70–74 in Castlemaine: 3.3% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Echuca - Moama: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Castlemaine: 3.9% males, 4.5% females; 65–69 in Echuca - Moama: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Castlemaine: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 60–64 in Echuca - Moama: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Echuca - Moama: 2.8% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Castlemaine: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Echuca - Moama: 2.9% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Echuca - Moama: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Echuca - Moama: 2.2% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Echuca - Moama: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Castlemaine: 3.0% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Echuca - Moama: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Echuca - Moama: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 1.1% females; 20–24 in Echuca - Moama: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Echuca - Moama: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Castlemaine: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Echuca - Moama: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Echuca - Moama: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Echuca - Moama: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $498
- First area, 2016: $577
- First area, 2021: $683
- Second area, 2011: $501
- Second area, 2016: $617
- Second area, 2021: $705
- First area, 2011: $905
- First area, 2016: $1,055
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2011: $918
- Second area, 2016: $1,288
- Second area, 2021: $1,347
- First area, 2011: $1,172
- First area, 2016: $1,399
- First area, 2021: $1,676
- Second area, 2011: $1,148
- Second area, 2016: $1,629
- Second area, 2021: $1,745
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $215
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2016: $290
- Second area, 2021: $290
- First area, 2011: $1,296
- First area, 2016: $1,270
- First area, 2021: $1,408
- Second area, 2011: $1,500
- Second area, 2016: $1,560
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Castlemaine with nearby areas
Compare Echuca - Moama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Castlemaine vs Echuca - Moama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2005/castlemaine/vs/2007/echuca-moama