Compare
Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Echuca - Moama
Urban Area comparison ≈ 148 km apart · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile · Echuca - Moama profile
Not in any Significant Urban Area Echuca - Moama
Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) and Echuca - Moama are both Victorian regions with distinct layouts. Echuca - Moama is more walkable (somewhat walkable) compared to Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.), which is mostly car-dependent. This is clear in the access to essentials: 74.5% of homes in Echuca - Moama are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, compared to only 41.7% in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.). Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) has a higher share of people working from home (17.2% versus 8.7%) and a larger proportion of homes owned outright (45.7% versus 39.8%).
Both areas have similar proportions of people with long-term health conditions, and both sit near the national figure for this measure. They also share similar typical weekly household incomes, around $1,340. While they are alike in these respects, some gaps are shifting; for example, the share of recent overseas arrivals is now well higher in Echuca - Moama, a difference that has widened since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 693,577
- First area, 2016: 689,078
- First area, 2021: 716,050
- Second area, 2011: 19,309
- Second area, 2016: 247,459
- Second area, 2021: 22,568
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Echuca - Moama: 1.3% males, 2.1% females
- 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Echuca - Moama: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Echuca - Moama: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Echuca - Moama: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Echuca - Moama: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Echuca - Moama: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Echuca - Moama: 2.8% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Echuca - Moama: 2.9% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Echuca - Moama: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Echuca - Moama: 2.2% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Echuca - Moama: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Echuca - Moama: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Echuca - Moama: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Echuca - Moama: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Echuca - Moama: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Echuca - Moama: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Echuca - Moama: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Echuca - Moama: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $476
- First area, 2016: $553
- First area, 2021: $680
- Second area, 2011: $501
- Second area, 2016: $617
- Second area, 2021: $705
- First area, 2011: $920
- First area, 2016: $1,086
- First area, 2021: $1,331
- Second area, 2011: $918
- Second area, 2016: $1,288
- Second area, 2021: $1,347
- First area, 2011: $1,158
- First area, 2016: $1,367
- First area, 2021: $1,728
- Second area, 2011: $1,148
- Second area, 2016: $1,629
- Second area, 2021: $1,745
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $290
- Second area, 2021: $290
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,387
- Second area, 2011: $1,500
- Second area, 2016: $1,560
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Compare Echuca - Moama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Echuca - Moama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area/vs/2007/echuca-moama