Compare
Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Gisborne
Urban Area comparison ≈ 160 km apart · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile · Gisborne profile
Not in any Significant Urban Area Gisborne
Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) and Gisborne are two distinct Victorian regions separated by 160 km. Gisborne is a more affluent area, with a typical weekly household income of $2,293 compared to $1,331 in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.). Educational attainment is also far higher in Gisborne, where 62% of residents completed Year 12 and 27.3% hold a bachelor degree or higher, while Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) has 42.5% finishing Year 12 and 16% with a degree. In contrast, Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.) has a noticeably older population, with a typical age of 48 and 24.8% of people aged 65 and over.
Since 2011, the gap in typical incomes and the share of university degrees has widened between the two. They do share some common ground, such as similar proportions of people who moved recently and a shared reliance on cars, as both are mostly car-dependent. While both sit near the national figure for unemployment, Gisborne has seen the gap grow in the number of children under 15, which is now 5 points higher than in Not in any Significant Urban Area (Vic.).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 693,577
- First area, 2016: 689,078
- First area, 2021: 716,050
- Second area, 2011: 18,013
- Second area, 2016: 16,250
- Second area, 2021: 22,200
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.1% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Gisborne: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Gisborne: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Gisborne: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Gisborne: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Gisborne: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Gisborne: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Gisborne: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Gisborne: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Gisborne: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Gisborne: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Gisborne: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Gisborne: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Gisborne: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Gisborne: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Gisborne: 3.8% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Gisborne: 4.2% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Gisborne: 4.1% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Gisborne: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $476
- First area, 2016: $553
- First area, 2021: $680
- Second area, 2011: $658
- Second area, 2016: $621
- Second area, 2021: $936
- First area, 2011: $920
- First area, 2016: $1,086
- First area, 2021: $1,331
- Second area, 2011: $1,659
- Second area, 2016: $1,102
- Second area, 2021: $2,293
- First area, 2011: $1,158
- First area, 2016: $1,367
- First area, 2021: $1,728
- Second area, 2011: $1,857
- Second area, 2016: $1,412
- Second area, 2021: $2,625
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,387
- Second area, 2011: $1,900
- Second area, 2016: $1,200
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Compare Gisborne with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Gisborne [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area/vs/2009/gisborne