Compare
Echuca - Moama vs Gisborne
Urban Area comparison ≈ 151 km apart · Echuca - Moama profile · Gisborne profile
Echuca - Moama Gisborne
Echuca - Moama and Gisborne are two Victorian areas with similar populations, but they differ sharply in wealth and education. Gisborne has a much higher typical weekly household income of $2,293, compared to $1,347 in Echuca - Moama. Education levels are also far higher in Gisborne, where 27.3% of adults have a bachelor degree or more, while only 14.1% do in Echuca - Moama. Gisborne is more likely to have large homes with three or more bedrooms and many more people working from home (26.8%). In contrast, Echuca - Moama is more walkable, with a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (58.6% versus 26.7% in Gisborne).
Both areas are effectively alike in their unemployment rates, which sit around 3% to 4%. However, other gaps have grown since 2011, such as the difference in typical incomes and the number of people working from home. Echuca - Moama has become more distinct for its older population—the typical resident is 46—and a higher number of recent arrivals from overseas (16.3%), which is far higher than in Gisborne (4.5%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 19,309
- First area, 2016: 247,459
- First area, 2021: 22,568
- Second area, 2011: 18,013
- Second area, 2016: 16,250
- Second area, 2021: 22,200
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Echuca - Moama: 1.3% males, 2.1% females; 85+ in Gisborne: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Echuca - Moama: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 80–84 in Gisborne: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Echuca - Moama: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Gisborne: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Echuca - Moama: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Gisborne: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Echuca - Moama: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Gisborne: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Echuca - Moama: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 60–64 in Gisborne: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Echuca - Moama: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Gisborne: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Echuca - Moama: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Gisborne: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Echuca - Moama: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Gisborne: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Echuca - Moama: 2.2% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Gisborne: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Echuca - Moama: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Gisborne: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Echuca - Moama: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Gisborne: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Echuca - Moama: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Gisborne: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Echuca - Moama: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Gisborne: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Echuca - Moama: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Gisborne: 3.8% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Echuca - Moama: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Gisborne: 4.2% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Echuca - Moama: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Gisborne: 4.1% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Echuca - Moama: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Gisborne: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $501
- First area, 2016: $617
- First area, 2021: $705
- Second area, 2011: $658
- Second area, 2016: $621
- Second area, 2021: $936
- First area, 2011: $918
- First area, 2016: $1,288
- First area, 2021: $1,347
- Second area, 2011: $1,659
- Second area, 2016: $1,102
- Second area, 2021: $2,293
- First area, 2011: $1,148
- First area, 2016: $1,629
- First area, 2021: $1,745
- Second area, 2011: $1,857
- Second area, 2016: $1,412
- Second area, 2021: $2,625
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $290
- First area, 2021: $290
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $1,500
- First area, 2016: $1,560
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,900
- Second area, 2016: $1,200
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Echuca - Moama with nearby areas
Compare Gisborne with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Echuca - Moama vs Gisborne [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/2007/echuca-moama/vs/2009/gisborne