Compare
Linden Park vs Mount Osmond
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.6 km apart · Linden Park profile · Mount Osmond profile
Linden Park Mount Osmond
Linden Park and Mount Osmond are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Linden Park is more diverse and urban, with 42.2% of people born overseas and 42.3% using a language other than English at home. It has a higher rental rate of 22.5% and more people living alone. In contrast, Mount Osmond is more affluent and residential, where 42% of households earn $3,000 or more a week. Every home there is a separate house, and 96.2% of these dwellings have three or more bedrooms.
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to the number of people per home, which is around 2.7 or 2.8. Life in Linden Park is much more connected, as every home is within a 15-minute walk of groceries, schools, and public transport. Mount Osmond is more car-dependent, with a typical walk to the nearest transport stop taking 25 minutes. While Linden Park has a higher rate of recorded offences, Mount Osmond has seen a much higher increase in crime over the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,888
- First area, 2016: 2,025
- First area, 2021: 2,367
- Second area, 2011: 497
- Second area, 2016: 378
- Second area, 2021: 464
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Linden Park: 2.1% males, 4.5% females; 85+ in Mount Osmond: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Linden Park: 1.5% males, 2.5% females; 80–84 in Mount Osmond: 0.6% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Linden Park: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Mount Osmond: 3.2% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Linden Park: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Linden Park: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Linden Park: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Linden Park: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 55–59 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 4.9% females
- 50–54 in Linden Park: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 50–54 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Linden Park: 2.6% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Mount Osmond: 4.7% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Linden Park: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Linden Park: 3.6% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Linden Park: 1.9% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Mount Osmond: 1.3% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Linden Park: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Mount Osmond: 1.5% males, 0.8% females
- 20–24 in Linden Park: 2.0% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Mount Osmond: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Linden Park: 3.8% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 10–14 in Linden Park: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 5.5% females
- 5–9 in Linden Park: 4.0% males, 4.3% females; 5–9 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Linden Park: 3.0% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Mount Osmond: 1.9% males, 0.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $630
- First area, 2016: $706
- First area, 2021: $874
- Second area, 2011: $845
- Second area, 2016: $1,022
- Second area, 2021: $1,142
- First area, 2011: $1,178
- First area, 2016: $1,392
- First area, 2021: $1,893
- Second area, 2011: $2,374
- Second area, 2016: $2,562
- Second area, 2021: $2,777
- First area, 2011: $1,639
- First area, 2016: $1,817
- First area, 2021: $2,370
- Second area, 2011: $2,650
- Second area, 2016: $3,083
- Second area, 2021: $3,125
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $280
- First area, 2016: $320
- First area, 2021: $413
- Second area, 2011: $285
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $441
- First area, 2011: $1,907
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,175
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,599
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Linden Park with nearby areas
Compare Mount Osmond with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Linden Park vs Mount Osmond [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40764/linden-park/vs/SAL40959/mount-osmond