Compare
Mount Osmond vs Urrbrae
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.7 km apart · Mount Osmond profile · Urrbrae profile
Mount Osmond Urrbrae
Urrbrae and Mount Osmond are neighbouring areas with very different layouts. Urrbrae is somewhat walkable, with 88.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and a far higher number of public transport stops. In contrast, Mount Osmond is car-dependent, with a much steeper terrain slope and no homes within a 15-minute walk of shops. Urrbrae also has a more diverse population, as 16.5% of residents arrived recently from overseas compared to just 2.6% in Mount Osmond.
Everyday life in both places shares several similarities, including a typical home size of 2.8 people and a similar share of children under 15. Both areas also have a high proportion of university-educated adults, well above the national figure. While Urrbrae has a much higher rate of theft, Mount Osmond has seen a far higher increase in its crime rate over the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 497
- First area, 2016: 378
- First area, 2021: 464
- Second area, 2011: 971
- Second area, 2016: 966
- Second area, 2021: 1,070
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Osmond: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Urrbrae: 0.9% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Mount Osmond: 0.6% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Urrbrae: 2.1% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Mount Osmond: 3.2% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Urrbrae: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 70–74 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Urrbrae: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Urrbrae: 2.2% males, 3.6% females
- 60–64 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Urrbrae: 3.7% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 4.9% females; 55–59 in Urrbrae: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Urrbrae: 2.4% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Mount Osmond: 4.7% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Urrbrae: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Urrbrae: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Urrbrae: 2.4% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Mount Osmond: 1.3% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Urrbrae: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 25–29 in Mount Osmond: 1.5% males, 0.8% females; 25–29 in Urrbrae: 1.1% males, 1.9% females
- 20–24 in Mount Osmond: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Urrbrae: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 15–19 in Urrbrae: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 10–14 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 5.5% females; 10–14 in Urrbrae: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Urrbrae: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Mount Osmond: 1.9% males, 0.8% females; 0–4 in Urrbrae: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $845
- First area, 2016: $1,022
- First area, 2021: $1,142
- Second area, 2011: $768
- Second area, 2016: $783
- Second area, 2021: $907
- First area, 2011: $2,374
- First area, 2016: $2,562
- First area, 2021: $2,777
- Second area, 2011: $1,681
- Second area, 2016: $1,795
- Second area, 2021: $2,346
- First area, 2011: $2,650
- First area, 2016: $3,083
- First area, 2021: $3,125
- Second area, 2011: $2,200
- Second area, 2016: $2,369
- Second area, 2021: $2,666
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $285
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $441
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $413
- Second area, 2021: $505
- First area, 2011: $2,175
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,599
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,383
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Mount Osmond with nearby areas
Compare Urrbrae with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Osmond vs Urrbrae [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40959/mount-osmond/vs/SAL41497/urrbrae