Compare
Mount Osmond vs Waterfall Gully
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.4 km apart · Mount Osmond profile · Waterfall Gully profile
Mount Osmond Waterfall Gully
Mount Osmond and Waterfall Gully are neighbouring areas with very high typical incomes, though Waterfall Gully is notably wealthier, with typical weekly earnings of $3,600 compared to $2,777 in Mount Osmond. Mount Osmond is the older of the two; its typical resident is 46, and 21.6% of its population are seniors. In contrast, Waterfall Gully is younger, with a typical age of 40 and only 8.7% of people aged 65 and over. This age gap is reflected in health and care, as people with long-term health conditions are far more common in Mount Osmond (27.8%) than in Waterfall Gully (17.4%).
Both areas are very similar in their low rates of renting and high levels of volunteering. They also share an identical lack of 15-minute-city walkability, as no homes in either place are within a 15-minute walk of groceries or schools. While they are alike in these ways, Mount Osmond stands out for its better access to public transport and parks, with 79% of its homes within a 15-minute walk of a park compared to just 23.7% in Waterfall Gully.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 497
- First area, 2016: 378
- First area, 2021: 464
- Second area, 2016: 145
- Second area, 2021: 161
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Osmond: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Waterfall Gully: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Mount Osmond: 0.6% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Waterfall Gully: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Mount Osmond: 3.2% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Waterfall Gully: 0.0% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Waterfall Gully: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Waterfall Gully: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Waterfall Gully: 2.0% males, 5.4% females
- 55–59 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 4.9% females; 55–59 in Waterfall Gully: 4.7% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Waterfall Gully: 8.8% males, 7.4% females
- 45–49 in Mount Osmond: 4.7% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Waterfall Gully: 4.1% males, 6.1% females
- 40–44 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Waterfall Gully: 2.0% males, 4.1% females
- 35–39 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Waterfall Gully: 2.0% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Mount Osmond: 1.3% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Waterfall Gully: 2.7% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in Mount Osmond: 1.5% males, 0.8% females; 25–29 in Waterfall Gully: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Mount Osmond: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Waterfall Gully: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 15–19 in Waterfall Gully: 8.1% males, 4.1% females
- 10–14 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 5.5% females; 10–14 in Waterfall Gully: 6.1% males, 8.1% females
- 5–9 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Waterfall Gully: 2.7% males, 2.0% females
- 0–4 in Mount Osmond: 1.9% males, 0.8% females; 0–4 in Waterfall Gully: 3.4% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $845
- First area, 2016: $1,022
- First area, 2021: $1,142
- Second area, 2016: $1,069
- Second area, 2021: $1,359
- First area, 2011: $2,374
- First area, 2016: $2,562
- First area, 2021: $2,777
- Second area, 2016: $3,042
- Second area, 2021: $3,600
- First area, 2011: $2,650
- First area, 2016: $3,083
- First area, 2021: $3,125
- Second area, 2016: $3,083
- Second area, 2021: $3,700
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 3.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $285
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $441
- Second area, 2016: $238
- Second area, 2021: $468
- First area, 2011: $2,175
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,599
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $3,250
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Mount Osmond with nearby areas
Compare Waterfall Gully with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Osmond vs Waterfall Gully [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40959/mount-osmond/vs/SAL41545/waterfall-gully