Compare
Beaumont vs Mount Osmond
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.7 km apart · Beaumont profile · Mount Osmond profile
Beaumont Mount Osmond
Beaumont (SA) and Mount Osmond are neighbouring areas in South Australia with very different layouts. Beaumont (SA) is a somewhat walkable area where 89.8% of homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, while Mount Osmond is car-dependent and only 1.4% of homes have that same access. Beaumont (SA) is also more diverse, with 27.4% of people using a language other than English at home and a higher share of recent overseas arrivals (12.9%). In contrast, Mount Osmond consists entirely of separate houses and has a much steeper terrain, with a mean slope of 25.0% compared to 11.5% in Beaumont (SA).
These two neighbours are very similar in other ways, particularly regarding wealth and age. Typical weekly household incomes are nearly identical, sitting at $2,577 in Beaumont (SA) and $2,777 in Mount Osmond. They also share almost the same proportion of children under 15 (around 18%) and residents aged 65 and over (around 22%). Both areas are well above the national figure for typical household incomes, reflecting a consistently high level of affluence across this part of the city.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,490
- First area, 2016: 2,577
- First area, 2021: 2,731
- Second area, 2011: 497
- Second area, 2016: 378
- Second area, 2021: 464
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Beaumont: 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Mount Osmond: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Beaumont: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Mount Osmond: 0.6% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Beaumont: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Osmond: 3.2% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Beaumont: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Beaumont: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 65–69 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Beaumont: 3.6% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Beaumont: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 4.9% females
- 50–54 in Beaumont: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Beaumont: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Mount Osmond: 4.7% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Beaumont: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Beaumont: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Beaumont: 1.5% males, 2.0% females; 30–34 in Mount Osmond: 1.3% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Beaumont: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Mount Osmond: 1.5% males, 0.8% females
- 20–24 in Beaumont: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Mount Osmond: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Beaumont: 3.6% males, 4.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 10–14 in Beaumont: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 5.5% females
- 5–9 in Beaumont: 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Beaumont: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Mount Osmond: 1.9% males, 0.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $825
- First area, 2016: $952
- First area, 2021: $1,096
- Second area, 2011: $845
- Second area, 2016: $1,022
- Second area, 2021: $1,142
- First area, 2011: $1,889
- First area, 2016: $2,265
- First area, 2021: $2,577
- Second area, 2011: $2,374
- Second area, 2016: $2,562
- Second area, 2021: $2,777
- First area, 2011: $2,254
- First area, 2016: $2,782
- First area, 2021: $3,034
- Second area, 2011: $2,650
- Second area, 2016: $3,083
- Second area, 2021: $3,125
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $410
- First area, 2016: $420
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $285
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $441
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,511
- Second area, 2011: $2,175
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,599
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Beaumont with nearby areas
Compare Mount Osmond with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Beaumont vs Mount Osmond [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40085/beaumont/vs/SAL40959/mount-osmond