Compare
Leawood Gardens vs Mount Osmond
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.2 km apart · Leawood Gardens profile · Mount Osmond profile
Leawood Gardens Mount Osmond
Mount Osmond and Leawood Gardens are neighbouring South Australian areas with very different profiles. Mount Osmond has a much more highly qualified workforce, with 53.5% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 34.0% in Leawood Gardens. This is reflected in the household income, where 42.0% of Mount Osmond homes earn $3,000 or more a week, while only 15.0% of Leawood Gardens homes do. Mount Osmond also has far more large homes, with 96.2% having three or more bedrooms, compared to 75.0% in Leawood Gardens.
Daily life in both places is similar in that every home is a separate detached house and no households get by without a motor vehicle. While they share these traits, they differ in how people access the world; Leawood Gardens has far more public transport departures and more walkable amenities per resident. However, Mount Osmond is far more likely to have people working from home, at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Leawood Gardens.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 61
- First area, 2021: 57
- Second area, 2011: 497
- Second area, 2016: 378
- Second area, 2021: 464
- First area, 2016: 54 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Osmond: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Leawood Gardens: 15.6% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Osmond: 0.6% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 8.9% females; 75–79 in Mount Osmond: 3.2% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Leawood Gardens: 6.7% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 6.7% females; 60–64 in Mount Osmond: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Leawood Gardens: 8.9% males, 6.7% females; 55–59 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 4.9% females
- 50–54 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Mount Osmond: 4.4% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Mount Osmond: 4.7% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Leawood Gardens: 6.7% males, 13.3% females; 40–44 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 8.9% females; 30–34 in Mount Osmond: 1.3% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Osmond: 1.5% males, 0.8% females
- 20–24 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Osmond: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Leawood Gardens: 8.9% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Osmond: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 10–14 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Mount Osmond: 2.1% males, 5.5% females
- 5–9 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 8.9% females; 5–9 in Mount Osmond: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Leawood Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Osmond: 1.9% males, 0.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $674
- First area, 2021: $1,174
- Second area, 2011: $845
- Second area, 2016: $1,022
- Second area, 2021: $1,142
- First area, 2016: $2,125
- First area, 2021: $2,666
- Second area, 2011: $2,374
- Second area, 2016: $2,562
- Second area, 2021: $2,777
- First area, 2016: $1,875
- First area, 2021: $2,749
- Second area, 2011: $2,650
- Second area, 2016: $3,083
- Second area, 2021: $3,125
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $260
- Second area, 2011: $285
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $441
- First area, 2016: $2,246
- First area, 2021: $2,300
- Second area, 2011: $2,175
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,599
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Leawood Gardens with nearby areas
Compare Mount Osmond with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Leawood Gardens vs Mount Osmond [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40755/leawood-gardens/vs/SAL40959/mount-osmond