Compare
Kalamunda vs Northam
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 62 km apart · Kalamunda profile · Northam profile
Kalamunda Northam
Northam and Kalamunda are both Western Australian areas with distinct profiles. Kalamunda has a more qualified workforce, with 19.7% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 9.3% in Northam. This is reflected in the typical household income, as 23.2% of Kalamunda homes earn $3,000 or more a week, which is far higher than the 13.1% in Northam. Kalamunda is also more accessible; its walkability score is 5.4 (somewhat walkable), while Northam is 2.3 (mostly car-dependent).
Daily life in both places shares many similarities, including almost identical rates of volunteering and the same proportion of people working from home. They also have a similar share of homes owned outright. However, some gaps are growing; for example, the difference in Year 12 completion has widened to 19.9 percentage points. Other gaps are narrowing, such as the share of people born overseas, which is now 10.6 percentage points higher in Kalamunda.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 53,567
- First area, 2016: 57,449
- First area, 2021: 58,762
- Second area, 2011: 10,557
- Second area, 2016: 11,112
- Second area, 2021: 11,358
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kalamunda: 0.9% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Northam: 0.7% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Kalamunda: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Northam: 1.1% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Kalamunda: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Northam: 1.9% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Kalamunda: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Northam: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Kalamunda: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Northam: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 60–64 in Kalamunda: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Northam: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Kalamunda: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Northam: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Kalamunda: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Northam: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Kalamunda: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Northam: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Northam: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Kalamunda: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Northam: 3.1% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Northam: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Kalamunda: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Northam: 2.7% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Northam: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Kalamunda: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Northam: 3.1% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Kalamunda: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Northam: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Northam: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Kalamunda: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Northam: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $681
- First area, 2016: $732
- First area, 2021: $835
- Second area, 2011: $517
- Second area, 2016: $581
- Second area, 2021: $660
- First area, 2011: $1,521
- First area, 2016: $1,661
- First area, 2021: $1,866
- Second area, 2011: $1,005
- Second area, 2016: $1,178
- Second area, 2021: $1,316
- First area, 2011: $1,779
- First area, 2016: $1,932
- First area, 2021: $2,215
- Second area, 2011: $1,242
- Second area, 2016: $1,468
- Second area, 2021: $1,631
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $370
- Second area, 2011: $180
- Second area, 2016: $245
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,989
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,907
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,408
- Second area, 2021: $1,393
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Kalamunda with nearby areas
Compare Northam with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kalamunda vs Northam [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA54200/kalamunda/vs/LGA56730/northam