Compare
Kalamunda vs Victoria Park
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 20 km apart · Kalamunda profile · Victoria Park profile
Kalamunda Victoria Park
Kalamunda and Victoria Park are nearby areas with very different living patterns. Victoria Park is more urban and diverse, with 24.4% of people using a language other than English at home and 36.8% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher. It has a high proportion of renters at 44.5% and many more people living alone. In contrast, Kalamunda is dominated by detached houses (93.8%) and larger homes, with 91.1% having three or more bedrooms. Residents there are more likely to own their homes outright, and the area is more family-oriented, with a higher share of children under 15.
Typical weekly incomes are almost identical in both places, sitting around $1,850. This financial similarity exists alongside different lifestyles: Victoria Park is very walkable and close to the city, while Kalamunda is somewhat walkable with a much longer drive time to the city. Over time, the gap in home ownership has narrowed slightly, and the difference in language diversity has also decreased since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 53,567
- First area, 2016: 57,449
- First area, 2021: 58,762
- Second area, 2011: 32,433
- Second area, 2016: 34,990
- Second area, 2021: 36,889
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kalamunda: 0.9% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Victoria Park: 0.9% males, 1.8% females
- 80–84 in Kalamunda: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Victoria Park: 0.8% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Kalamunda: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Victoria Park: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Kalamunda: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Victoria Park: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Kalamunda: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Victoria Park: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Kalamunda: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Victoria Park: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Kalamunda: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Victoria Park: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Kalamunda: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Victoria Park: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Kalamunda: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Victoria Park: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Victoria Park: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Kalamunda: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Victoria Park: 4.7% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Victoria Park: 5.3% males, 5.2% females
- 25–29 in Kalamunda: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Victoria Park: 5.4% males, 5.1% females
- 20–24 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Victoria Park: 4.1% males, 4.2% females
- 15–19 in Kalamunda: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Victoria Park: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 10–14 in Kalamunda: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Victoria Park: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 5–9 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Victoria Park: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Kalamunda: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Victoria Park: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $681
- First area, 2016: $732
- First area, 2021: $835
- Second area, 2011: $696
- Second area, 2016: $766
- Second area, 2021: $987
- First area, 2011: $1,521
- First area, 2016: $1,661
- First area, 2021: $1,866
- Second area, 2011: $1,360
- Second area, 2016: $1,554
- Second area, 2021: $1,844
- First area, 2011: $1,779
- First area, 2016: $1,932
- First area, 2021: $2,215
- Second area, 2011: $1,844
- Second area, 2016: $1,998
- Second area, 2021: $2,473
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $370
- Second area, 2011: $310
- Second area, 2016: $351
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $1,989
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,907
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,037
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Kalamunda with nearby areas
Compare Victoria Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kalamunda vs Victoria Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA54200/kalamunda/vs/LGA58510/victoria-park