Compare
Belmont vs Kalamunda
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 17 km apart · Belmont profile · Kalamunda profile
Belmont Kalamunda
Kalamunda and Belmont are nearby areas in Greater Perth with very different housing and social profiles. Kalamunda is dominated by large, detached houses, with 93.8% of homes being separate houses and 91.1% having three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Belmont has more variety in its housing, with a far higher share of renters (44.0% compared to 16.7% in Kalamunda) and more people living alone. Belmont is also much more culturally diverse, with 40.9% of people born overseas and 31.0% using a language other than English at home, compared to 28.6% and 12.6% in Kalamunda respectively.
The gap in housing tenure has widened since 2011, with the difference in renting and outright ownership growing. Despite these diverging trends, the two areas share similar typical weekly family incomes, around $2,100, and have nearly identical shares of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents. Both areas also sit close to the national figure for overall advantage.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 35,209
- First area, 2016: 39,682
- First area, 2021: 42,257
- Second area, 2011: 53,567
- Second area, 2016: 57,449
- Second area, 2021: 58,762
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Belmont: 0.8% males, 1.4% females; 85+ in Kalamunda: 0.9% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Belmont: 0.8% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Kalamunda: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Belmont: 1.2% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Kalamunda: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Belmont: 1.6% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Kalamunda: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Belmont: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Kalamunda: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Belmont: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Kalamunda: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Belmont: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 55–59 in Kalamunda: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Belmont: 3.2% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Kalamunda: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Belmont: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Kalamunda: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Belmont: 3.6% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Belmont: 4.6% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Kalamunda: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Belmont: 5.2% males, 5.1% females; 30–34 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Belmont: 5.1% males, 4.7% females; 25–29 in Kalamunda: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Belmont: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 20–24 in Kalamunda: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Belmont: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 15–19 in Kalamunda: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Belmont: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 10–14 in Kalamunda: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Belmont: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Kalamunda: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Belmont: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Kalamunda: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $659
- First area, 2016: $722
- First area, 2021: $886
- Second area, 2011: $681
- Second area, 2016: $732
- Second area, 2021: $835
- First area, 2011: $1,263
- First area, 2016: $1,431
- First area, 2021: $1,641
- Second area, 2011: $1,521
- Second area, 2016: $1,661
- Second area, 2021: $1,866
- First area, 2011: $1,556
- First area, 2016: $1,725
- First area, 2021: $2,086
- Second area, 2011: $1,779
- Second area, 2016: $1,932
- Second area, 2021: $2,215
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $300
- First area, 2016: $350
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $320
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $370
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,989
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,907
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Belmont with nearby areas
Compare Kalamunda with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Belmont vs Kalamunda [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA50490/belmont/vs/LGA54200/kalamunda