Compare
Emu Park vs Bouldercombe
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 44 km apart · Emu Park profile · Bouldercombe profile
Emu Park Bouldercombe
Emu Park and Bouldercombe (L) are both residential areas in Queensland, but they differ in how people live and move. Emu Park is much more transient and walkable, with 45.9% of residents moving in during the last five years and far more homes within a 15-minute walk of a park. Renting is also far more common in Emu Park, where 28.3% of households rent, compared to just 9.7% in Bouldercombe (L). In contrast, Bouldercombe (L) has a higher share of separate houses and more people working or looking for work.
Their paths have diverged since 2011, with Emu Park seeing a surge in new arrivals and renters while Bouldercombe (L) has become even more dominated by homeowners. Despite these shifts, the two areas share several core traits. They have identical shares of children under 15 and a very similar proportion of residents who are Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander. Both areas also sit well above the national figure for the share of people aged 65 and over.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,574
- First area, 2016: 1,712
- First area, 2021: 4,860
- Second area, 2011: 542
- Second area, 2016: 963
- Second area, 2021: 758
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emu Park: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Bouldercombe: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Emu Park: 1.3% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Bouldercombe: 0.8% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Emu Park: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Bouldercombe: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Emu Park: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Emu Park: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 65–69 in Bouldercombe: 4.4% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Emu Park: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Bouldercombe: 4.4% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Emu Park: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Bouldercombe: 4.8% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Emu Park: 2.7% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Emu Park: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Bouldercombe: 2.7% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Emu Park: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Bouldercombe: 4.0% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Emu Park: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Emu Park: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Bouldercombe: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Emu Park: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Bouldercombe: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 20–24 in Emu Park: 1.5% males, 1.4% females; 20–24 in Bouldercombe: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Bouldercombe: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Emu Park: 3.6% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Bouldercombe: 2.0% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Emu Park: 3.4% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Emu Park: 3.2% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Bouldercombe: 2.7% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $536
- First area, 2016: $518
- First area, 2021: $628
- Second area, 2011: $642
- Second area, 2016: $717
- Second area, 2021: $689
- First area, 2011: $1,294
- First area, 2016: $905
- First area, 2021: $1,263
- Second area, 2011: $1,527
- Second area, 2016: $1,730
- Second area, 2021: $1,442
- First area, 2011: $1,353
- First area, 2016: $1,178
- First area, 2021: $1,482
- Second area, 2011: $1,426
- Second area, 2016: $1,762
- Second area, 2021: $1,661
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $1,863
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,540
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Emu Park with nearby areas
Compare Bouldercombe with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emu Park vs Bouldercombe [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315032/emu-park/vs/UCL321021/bouldercombe