Compare
Mount Morgan vs Bouldercombe
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Mount Morgan profile · Bouldercombe profile
Mount Morgan Bouldercombe
Mount Morgan and Bouldercombe (L) are nearby Queensland areas with very different profiles. Bouldercombe (L) is far wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $1,442 compared to $780 in Mount Morgan. Life in Mount Morgan involves more struggle, with far higher rates of unemployment (14.9% versus 2.5%) and long-term health conditions (47.2% versus 31.5%). It also has many more one-parent families (26.2% versus 11.7%) and people living alone (42.3% versus 22.4%). Mount Morgan is a more walkable place, described as mostly car-dependent, while Bouldercombe (L) is simply car-dependent.
The gap in unemployment has widened since 2011, reflecting a growing divide in job security between the two. Despite this, they share some common ground, such as having almost no residents who speak little or no English and similar rates of people providing unpaid care. Both areas also have a higher proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people than the national figure, though this is more pronounced in Mount Morgan at 14.2%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,732
- First area, 2016: 1,039
- First area, 2021: 2,487
- Second area, 2011: 542
- Second area, 2016: 963
- Second area, 2021: 758
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Morgan: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 85+ in Bouldercombe: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Mount Morgan: 2.1% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Bouldercombe: 0.8% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Mount Morgan: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 75–79 in Bouldercombe: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Mount Morgan: 4.2% males, 3.7% females; 70–74 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Mount Morgan: 4.8% males, 5.1% females; 65–69 in Bouldercombe: 4.4% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Mount Morgan: 4.9% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Bouldercombe: 4.4% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Mount Morgan: 4.6% males, 4.6% females; 55–59 in Bouldercombe: 4.8% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Mount Morgan: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Mount Morgan: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Bouldercombe: 2.7% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Mount Morgan: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Bouldercombe: 4.0% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Mount Morgan: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 35–39 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Mount Morgan: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Bouldercombe: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Mount Morgan: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 25–29 in Bouldercombe: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 20–24 in Mount Morgan: 2.7% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Bouldercombe: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Mount Morgan: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 15–19 in Bouldercombe: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Mount Morgan: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Bouldercombe: 2.0% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Mount Morgan: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Mount Morgan: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Bouldercombe: 2.7% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $499
- First area, 2016: $681
- First area, 2021: $461
- Second area, 2011: $642
- Second area, 2016: $717
- Second area, 2021: $689
- First area, 2011: $866
- First area, 2016: $1,482
- First area, 2021: $780
- Second area, 2011: $1,527
- Second area, 2016: $1,730
- Second area, 2021: $1,442
- First area, 2011: $1,182
- First area, 2016: $1,643
- First area, 2021: $1,057
- Second area, 2011: $1,426
- Second area, 2016: $1,762
- Second area, 2021: $1,661
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $1,820
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $756
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Morgan with nearby areas
Compare Bouldercombe with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Morgan vs Bouldercombe [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315069/mount-morgan/vs/UCL321021/bouldercombe