Compare
Emu Park vs Kinka Beach
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 8.0 km apart · Emu Park profile · Kinka Beach profile
Emu Park Kinka Beach
Emu Park and Kinka Beach (L) are neighbouring Queensland areas with very different housing and demographics. Emu Park is more family-oriented, with 18.1% of people under 15 and a far higher share of separate houses (90.9%) and large homes, 82.3% of which have three or more bedrooms. It also has better access to amenities, with 21.0% of homes within walking distance of a school. In contrast, Kinka Beach (L) has a much older population, with a typical resident aged 56, and far more people living alone (39.0%). Residents there are also more likely to own their homes outright, at 52.2%.
The age gap between the two has widened since 2011, as Kinka Beach (L) has become far older than Emu Park. Despite this, they share several traits, such as similar proportions of people born overseas and adults with a bachelor degree. Both areas also have very few residents who speak little or no English and similar rates of people who have served in the Defence Force.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,574
- First area, 2016: 1,712
- First area, 2021: 4,860
- Second area, 2011: 586
- Second area, 2016: 762
- Second area, 2021: 674
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 56 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emu Park: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Kinka Beach: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Emu Park: 1.3% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Kinka Beach: 1.6% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Emu Park: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Kinka Beach: 3.5% males, 4.7% females
- 70–74 in Emu Park: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Kinka Beach: 3.8% males, 4.8% females
- 65–69 in Emu Park: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 65–69 in Kinka Beach: 5.2% males, 5.7% females
- 60–64 in Emu Park: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Kinka Beach: 4.2% males, 5.2% females
- 55–59 in Emu Park: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Kinka Beach: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Emu Park: 2.7% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Kinka Beach: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Emu Park: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Kinka Beach: 3.9% males, 1.5% females
- 40–44 in Emu Park: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Kinka Beach: 1.2% males, 1.7% females
- 35–39 in Emu Park: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Kinka Beach: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Emu Park: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Kinka Beach: 1.0% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Emu Park: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Kinka Beach: 1.6% males, 1.3% females
- 20–24 in Emu Park: 1.5% males, 1.4% females; 20–24 in Kinka Beach: 1.5% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Kinka Beach: 1.6% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Emu Park: 3.6% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Kinka Beach: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Emu Park: 3.4% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Kinka Beach: 1.5% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Emu Park: 3.2% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Kinka Beach: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $536
- First area, 2016: $518
- First area, 2021: $628
- Second area, 2011: $549
- Second area, 2016: $540
- Second area, 2021: $552
- First area, 2011: $1,294
- First area, 2016: $905
- First area, 2021: $1,263
- Second area, 2011: $895
- Second area, 2016: $900
- Second area, 2021: $867
- First area, 2011: $1,353
- First area, 2016: $1,178
- First area, 2021: $1,482
- Second area, 2011: $1,341
- Second area, 2016: $1,135
- Second area, 2021: $1,170
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2016: $180
- Second area, 2021: $298
- First area, 2011: $1,863
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,540
- Second area, 2011: $1,061
- Second area, 2016: $816
- Second area, 2021: $1,410
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.30
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Emu Park with nearby areas
Compare Kinka Beach with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emu Park vs Kinka Beach [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315032/emu-park/vs/UCL321061/kinka-beach