Compare
Emu Park vs Keppel Sands
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 2.8 km apart · Emu Park profile · Keppel Sands profile
Emu Park Keppel Sands
Emu Park and Keppel Sands (L) are neighbouring coastal areas with very different profiles. Emu Park is larger and more dynamic, with 45.9% of people moving in during the last five years and a higher proportion of children under 15 (18.1%). In contrast, Keppel Sands (L) is much older, with a typical resident aged 59 and 39.6% of the population aged 65 or over. Keppel Sands (L) is also far more convenient for pedestrians; it is described as somewhat walkable, while Emu Park is car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries.
Both areas share very similar rates of people born overseas and those who identify as having no religion. Since 2011, the age gap between the two has narrowed, as has the difference in home ownership and the number of children in each area. However, some gaps have grown, with renting now far higher in Emu Park than in Keppel Sands (L).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,574
- First area, 2016: 1,712
- First area, 2021: 4,860
- Second area, 2011: 216
- Second area, 2016: 432
- Second area, 2021: 346
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 60 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 59 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emu Park: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Keppel Sands: 1.8% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Emu Park: 1.3% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Keppel Sands: 3.8% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Emu Park: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Keppel Sands: 4.1% males, 4.7% females
- 70–74 in Emu Park: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Keppel Sands: 5.6% males, 4.1% females
- 65–69 in Emu Park: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 65–69 in Keppel Sands: 6.8% males, 6.8% females
- 60–64 in Emu Park: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Keppel Sands: 3.8% males, 6.2% females
- 55–59 in Emu Park: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Keppel Sands: 5.3% males, 5.3% females
- 50–54 in Emu Park: 2.7% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Keppel Sands: 3.8% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Emu Park: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Keppel Sands: 4.1% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Emu Park: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Keppel Sands: 0.9% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Emu Park: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Keppel Sands: 1.2% males, 1.8% females
- 30–34 in Emu Park: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Keppel Sands: 0.9% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Emu Park: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Keppel Sands: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Emu Park: 1.5% males, 1.4% females; 20–24 in Keppel Sands: 2.4% males, 0.9% females
- 15–19 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Keppel Sands: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Emu Park: 3.6% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Keppel Sands: 2.1% males, 1.2% females
- 5–9 in Emu Park: 3.4% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Keppel Sands: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Emu Park: 3.2% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Keppel Sands: 0.9% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $536
- First area, 2016: $518
- First area, 2021: $628
- Second area, 2011: $335
- Second area, 2016: $429
- Second area, 2021: $541
- First area, 2011: $1,294
- First area, 2016: $905
- First area, 2021: $1,263
- Second area, 2011: $569
- Second area, 2016: $713
- Second area, 2021: $893
- First area, 2011: $1,353
- First area, 2016: $1,178
- First area, 2021: $1,482
- Second area, 2011: $690
- Second area, 2016: $962
- Second area, 2021: $1,125
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 1.7
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 1.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2016: $153
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $1,863
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,540
- Second area, 2011: $765
- Second area, 2016: $1,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Emu Park with nearby areas
Compare Keppel Sands with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emu Park vs Keppel Sands [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315032/emu-park/vs/UCL322069/keppel-sands