Compare
Gracemere vs Bouldercombe
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Gracemere profile · Bouldercombe profile
Gracemere Bouldercombe
Gracemere and Bouldercombe (L) are two nearby Queensland areas with very different profiles. Gracemere is a younger and more mobile hub, where the typical resident is 32 and 46.3% of people moved in the last five years. It has far more rental properties (40.5%) and a higher share of one-parent families (21.8%) compared to Bouldercombe (L). Living in Gracemere is also more convenient; many more homes are within a 15-minute walk of parks, schools, and groceries, whereas Bouldercombe (L) is far more car-dependent.
Both areas sit near the national figure for people providing unpaid care, at about 12%. This commonality exists alongside other similarities, such as typical monthly mortgage payments of $1,517 in both places. While they share some basics, the gap in housing tenure has widened since 2011, with Bouldercombe (L) becoming much more likely to have homes owned outright (43.2%) compared to Gracemere (21.6%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 17,285
- First area, 2016: 10,814
- First area, 2021: 11,534
- Second area, 2011: 542
- Second area, 2016: 963
- Second area, 2021: 758
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 29 yrs
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gracemere: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Bouldercombe: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Gracemere: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Bouldercombe: 0.8% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Gracemere: 1.0% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Bouldercombe: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Gracemere: 1.5% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Gracemere: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Bouldercombe: 4.4% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Gracemere: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Bouldercombe: 4.4% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Gracemere: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Bouldercombe: 4.8% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Gracemere: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Gracemere: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Bouldercombe: 2.7% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Gracemere: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Bouldercombe: 4.0% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Gracemere: 4.0% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Gracemere: 3.3% males, 4.2% females; 30–34 in Bouldercombe: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Gracemere: 3.3% males, 3.9% females; 25–29 in Bouldercombe: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 20–24 in Gracemere: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Bouldercombe: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Gracemere: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Bouldercombe: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Gracemere: 4.5% males, 4.4% females; 10–14 in Bouldercombe: 2.0% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Gracemere: 4.5% males, 4.7% females; 5–9 in Bouldercombe: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Gracemere: 4.5% males, 3.9% females; 0–4 in Bouldercombe: 2.7% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $444
- First area, 2016: $676
- First area, 2021: $780
- Second area, 2011: $642
- Second area, 2016: $717
- Second area, 2021: $689
- First area, 2011: $801
- First area, 2016: $1,423
- First area, 2021: $1,709
- Second area, 2011: $1,527
- Second area, 2016: $1,730
- Second area, 2021: $1,442
- First area, 2011: $971
- First area, 2016: $1,520
- First area, 2021: $1,848
- Second area, 2011: $1,426
- Second area, 2016: $1,762
- Second area, 2021: $1,661
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $1,387
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Gracemere with nearby areas
Compare Bouldercombe with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gracemere vs Bouldercombe [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL313005/gracemere/vs/UCL321021/bouldercombe