Compare
Gracemere vs Emu Park
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 38 km apart · Gracemere profile · Emu Park profile
Gracemere Emu Park
Gracemere and Emu Park are two nearby Queensland areas with very different profiles. Gracemere is a young hub where the typical resident is 32 and 26.6% are children under 15, which helps explain why 35.4% of adults provide unpaid childcare. In contrast, Emu Park is far older, with a typical age of 48 and 27.2% of people aged 65 and over. These differences extend to housing and work; Gracemere has a far higher share of renters (40.5%) and adults working or looking for work (64.2%), while 39.5% of Emu Park homes are owned outright.
Both areas share a similar housing market in terms of cost, with typical weekly rents and monthly mortgage payments being almost identical. They also have very similar unemployment rates and a shared lack of public transport, with no homes within a 10 minute walk of a stop. While Gracemere is more walkable for schools and groceries, the gap in age and home ownership between the two has widened since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 17,285
- First area, 2016: 10,814
- First area, 2021: 11,534
- Second area, 2011: 3,574
- Second area, 2016: 1,712
- Second area, 2021: 4,860
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 29 yrs
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gracemere: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Emu Park: 1.2% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Gracemere: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Emu Park: 1.3% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Gracemere: 1.0% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Emu Park: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Gracemere: 1.5% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Emu Park: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Gracemere: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Emu Park: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 60–64 in Gracemere: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Emu Park: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Gracemere: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Emu Park: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Gracemere: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Emu Park: 2.7% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Gracemere: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Emu Park: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Gracemere: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Emu Park: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Gracemere: 4.0% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Emu Park: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Gracemere: 3.3% males, 4.2% females; 30–34 in Emu Park: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Gracemere: 3.3% males, 3.9% females; 25–29 in Emu Park: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Gracemere: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Emu Park: 1.5% males, 1.4% females
- 15–19 in Gracemere: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Gracemere: 4.5% males, 4.4% females; 10–14 in Emu Park: 3.6% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Gracemere: 4.5% males, 4.7% females; 5–9 in Emu Park: 3.4% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Gracemere: 4.5% males, 3.9% females; 0–4 in Emu Park: 3.2% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $444
- First area, 2016: $676
- First area, 2021: $780
- Second area, 2011: $536
- Second area, 2016: $518
- Second area, 2021: $628
- First area, 2011: $801
- First area, 2016: $1,423
- First area, 2021: $1,709
- Second area, 2011: $1,294
- Second area, 2016: $905
- Second area, 2021: $1,263
- First area, 2011: $971
- First area, 2016: $1,520
- First area, 2021: $1,848
- Second area, 2011: $1,353
- Second area, 2016: $1,178
- Second area, 2021: $1,482
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $1,387
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,863
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,540
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Gracemere with nearby areas
Compare Emu Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gracemere vs Emu Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL313005/gracemere/vs/UCL315032/emu-park