Compare
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs vs Malmsbury
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 26 km apart · Daylesford - Hepburn Springs profile · Malmsbury profile
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs Malmsbury
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs and Malmsbury (L) are two nearby Victorian areas with very different resident profiles. Daylesford - Hepburn Springs is much older, with a typical resident aged 54 and 30.4% of people aged 65 and over. This is reflected in the homes, where 39.2% of people live alone and 45.1% of homes are owned outright. In contrast, Malmsbury (L) has a younger feel, with a typical age of 44 and a much higher share of families with children (55.4% compared to 36.7% in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs). Malmsbury (L) also has more large homes, with 79.8% having three or more bedrooms, and a higher typical weekly household income of $1,633.
Since 2011, the gap in typical age has narrowed from 15 to 10 years. Both areas are now considered somewhat walkable, and they share very similar figures for typical weekly personal incomes and the share of people who work from home. While Daylesford - Hepburn Springs has seen more recent overseas arrivals, both areas sit well below the national figure for people who speak a language other than English at home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,768
- First area, 2016: 2,139
- First area, 2021: 3,732
- Second area, 2011: 546
- Second area, 2016: 806
- Second area, 2021: 736
- First area, 2011: 51 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 63 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in Malmsbury: 0.5% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.4% males, 2.4% females; 80–84 in Malmsbury: 0.7% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Malmsbury: 1.2% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 70–74 in Malmsbury: 3.2% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.0% males, 5.2% females; 65–69 in Malmsbury: 3.4% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.5% males, 5.7% females; 60–64 in Malmsbury: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.4% males, 4.9% females; 55–59 in Malmsbury: 4.7% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 3.7% males, 4.7% females; 50–54 in Malmsbury: 4.4% males, 5.1% females
- 45–49 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Malmsbury: 3.4% males, 1.8% females
- 40–44 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Malmsbury: 3.4% males, 4.1% females
- 35–39 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 35–39 in Malmsbury: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Malmsbury: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Malmsbury: 2.9% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 20–24 in Malmsbury: 1.6% males, 1.2% females
- 15–19 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.3% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Malmsbury: 3.2% males, 1.4% females
- 10–14 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Malmsbury: 2.2% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Malmsbury: 4.5% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Malmsbury: 4.1% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $430
- First area, 2016: $739
- First area, 2021: $718
- Second area, 2011: $562
- Second area, 2016: $402
- Second area, 2021: $759
- First area, 2011: $751
- First area, 2016: $1,441
- First area, 2021: $1,205
- Second area, 2011: $1,297
- Second area, 2016: $606
- Second area, 2021: $1,633
- First area, 2011: $948
- First area, 2016: $1,672
- First area, 2021: $1,738
- Second area, 2011: $1,294
- Second area, 2016: $771
- Second area, 2021: $1,833
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 1.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $360
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,470
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $700
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.60
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Daylesford - Hepburn Springs with nearby areas
Compare Malmsbury with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Daylesford - Hepburn Springs vs Malmsbury [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215029/daylesford-hepburn-springs/vs/UCL221045/malmsbury