Compare
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs vs Dales Creek
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 24 km apart · Daylesford - Hepburn Springs profile · Dales Creek profile
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs Dales Creek
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs and Dales Creek (L) are two distinct Victorian areas with very different populations. Daylesford - Hepburn Springs is a much older community where the typical resident is 54, and 30.4% of people are aged 65 or over. In contrast, Dales Creek (L) is younger, with a typical age of 40 and a much higher share of children under 15 at 21.6%. This difference is reflected in the housing; homes in Dales Creek (L) are more likely to have three or more bedrooms, while more people in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs live alone. Economically, typical weekly household income is far higher in Dales Creek (L) at $1,966, compared to $1,205 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs.
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to the share of people who provide unpaid care, at around 13.7%. Outside of this, they have moved in opposite directions since 2011, as the age and income gaps between them have widened. Daylesford - Hepburn Springs is somewhat walkable and has a higher share of people working from home, whereas Dales Creek (L) is car-dependent. This is further highlighted by the fact that no homes in Dales Creek (L) are within a 15-minute walk of public transport or groceries.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,768
- First area, 2016: 2,139
- First area, 2021: 3,732
- Second area, 2011: 336
- Second area, 2016: 379
- Second area, 2021: 403
- First area, 2011: 51 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in Dales Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.4% males, 2.4% females; 80–84 in Dales Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Dales Creek: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 70–74 in Dales Creek: 3.0% males, 3.8% females
- 65–69 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.0% males, 5.2% females; 65–69 in Dales Creek: 2.0% males, 0.8% females
- 60–64 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.5% males, 5.7% females; 60–64 in Dales Creek: 2.3% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.4% males, 4.9% females; 55–59 in Dales Creek: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 3.7% males, 4.7% females; 50–54 in Dales Creek: 4.6% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Dales Creek: 5.8% males, 4.8% females
- 40–44 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Dales Creek: 3.3% males, 5.6% females
- 35–39 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 35–39 in Dales Creek: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Dales Creek: 2.5% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Dales Creek: 2.3% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 20–24 in Dales Creek: 2.3% males, 1.0% females
- 15–19 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.3% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Dales Creek: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Dales Creek: 4.6% males, 5.1% females
- 5–9 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Dales Creek: 4.6% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Dales Creek: 1.0% males, 4.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $430
- First area, 2016: $739
- First area, 2021: $718
- Second area, 2011: $535
- Second area, 2016: $711
- Second area, 2021: $917
- First area, 2011: $751
- First area, 2016: $1,441
- First area, 2021: $1,205
- Second area, 2011: $1,212
- Second area, 2016: $1,485
- Second area, 2021: $1,966
- First area, 2011: $948
- First area, 2016: $1,672
- First area, 2021: $1,738
- Second area, 2011: $1,524
- Second area, 2016: $1,766
- Second area, 2021: $2,269
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2016: $369
- Second area, 2021: $271
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,470
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,500
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Daylesford - Hepburn Springs with nearby areas
Compare Dales Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Daylesford - Hepburn Springs vs Dales Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215029/daylesford-hepburn-springs/vs/UCL222014/dales-creek