Compare
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs vs Newstead
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 27 km apart · Daylesford - Hepburn Springs profile · Newstead profile
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs Newstead
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs and Newstead (L) are nearby Victorian areas with very different profiles. Daylesford - Hepburn Springs has a larger population and is more diverse, with 18.3% of residents born overseas and a higher share of people using another language at home. It is also more focused on the rental market, where 23.7% of homes are rented. In contrast, Newstead (L) is more family-oriented, with a well higher share of children under 15 (16.8%) and more people caring for children unpaid. Newstead (L) also has much better walkability to daily needs, with 78.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries compared to 54.4% in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs.
Since 2011, these two areas have tracked in different directions. The gap in rental rates has widened, while the age difference has narrowed as the typical resident in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs is now only 3 years older than in Newstead (L). Despite these shifts, they remain very similar in other ways. Both have almost identical typical weekly family incomes, around $1,700, and the same share of people providing unpaid care. They also both have a high proportion of residents who own their homes outright.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,768
- First area, 2016: 2,139
- First area, 2021: 3,732
- Second area, 2011: 730
- Second area, 2016: 525
- Second area, 2021: 656
- First area, 2011: 51 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 51 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in Newstead: 0.9% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.4% males, 2.4% females; 80–84 in Newstead: 1.5% males, 3.0% females
- 75–79 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Newstead: 2.4% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 70–74 in Newstead: 3.3% males, 4.7% females
- 65–69 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.0% males, 5.2% females; 65–69 in Newstead: 6.7% males, 4.4% females
- 60–64 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.5% males, 5.7% females; 60–64 in Newstead: 3.9% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.4% males, 4.9% females; 55–59 in Newstead: 3.9% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 3.7% males, 4.7% females; 50–54 in Newstead: 2.4% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Newstead: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 40–44 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Newstead: 2.6% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 35–39 in Newstead: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Newstead: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Newstead: 1.1% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 20–24 in Newstead: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.3% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Newstead: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Newstead: 3.3% males, 2.3% females
- 5–9 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Newstead: 3.8% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Newstead: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $430
- First area, 2016: $739
- First area, 2021: $718
- Second area, 2011: $511
- Second area, 2016: $660
- Second area, 2021: $612
- First area, 2011: $751
- First area, 2016: $1,441
- First area, 2021: $1,205
- Second area, 2011: $976
- Second area, 2016: $1,562
- Second area, 2021: $1,034
- First area, 2011: $948
- First area, 2016: $1,672
- First area, 2021: $1,738
- Second area, 2011: $1,034
- Second area, 2016: $1,841
- Second area, 2021: $1,687
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2016: $273
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,470
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,250
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Daylesford - Hepburn Springs with nearby areas
Compare Newstead with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Daylesford - Hepburn Springs vs Newstead [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215029/daylesford-hepburn-springs/vs/UCL221054/newstead