Compare
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs vs Trentham
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 17 km apart · Daylesford - Hepburn Springs profile · Trentham profile
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs Trentham
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs and Trentham (L) are nearby Victorian areas with older populations. Trentham (L) is very walkable and has much higher access to essentials, with 96.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 96.3% near health services. In contrast, Daylesford - Hepburn Springs is only somewhat walkable, with groceries (54.4%) and health services (48.2%) within a 15-minute walk for far fewer homes. Trentham (L) also has a higher share of people working from home at 38.3% and more households earning $3,000 or more a week (17.0%).
The gap in people working from home has widened since 2011, rising from 3.9% to 12.0%. Both areas share very similar typical weekly incomes and household sizes, with about two people per home. They are also alike in their views on religion, as over half of residents in both places report having no religion. While both are far older than the national figure, residents in Trentham (L) are noticeably older, with a typical age of 58 compared to 54 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,768
- First area, 2016: 2,139
- First area, 2021: 3,732
- Second area, 2011: 589
- Second area, 2016: 944
- Second area, 2021: 827
- First area, 2011: 51 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 58 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 58 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in Trentham: 1.2% males, 3.3% females
- 80–84 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.4% males, 2.4% females; 80–84 in Trentham: 2.1% males, 3.2% females
- 75–79 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Trentham: 4.2% males, 3.8% females
- 70–74 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 70–74 in Trentham: 5.5% males, 4.3% females
- 65–69 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.0% males, 5.2% females; 65–69 in Trentham: 4.1% males, 6.3% females
- 60–64 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.5% males, 5.7% females; 60–64 in Trentham: 4.2% males, 5.7% females
- 55–59 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.4% males, 4.9% females; 55–59 in Trentham: 4.2% males, 5.3% females
- 50–54 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 3.7% males, 4.7% females; 50–54 in Trentham: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Trentham: 2.3% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Trentham: 1.8% males, 1.5% females
- 35–39 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 35–39 in Trentham: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 30–34 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Trentham: 1.0% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Trentham: 1.5% males, 1.4% females
- 20–24 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 20–24 in Trentham: 0.7% males, 0.5% females
- 15–19 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.3% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Trentham: 1.8% males, 1.2% females
- 10–14 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Trentham: 2.6% males, 1.0% females
- 5–9 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Trentham: 3.2% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Trentham: 2.6% males, 1.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $430
- First area, 2016: $739
- First area, 2021: $718
- Second area, 2011: $358
- Second area, 2016: $443
- Second area, 2021: $723
- First area, 2011: $751
- First area, 2016: $1,441
- First area, 2021: $1,205
- Second area, 2011: $547
- Second area, 2016: $677
- Second area, 2021: $1,395
- First area, 2011: $948
- First area, 2016: $1,672
- First area, 2021: $1,738
- Second area, 2011: $693
- Second area, 2016: $821
- Second area, 2021: $1,838
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 1.8
- Second area, 2016: 1.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2016: $218
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,470
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,203
- Second area, 2016: $1,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.60
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Daylesford - Hepburn Springs with nearby areas
Compare Trentham with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Daylesford - Hepburn Springs vs Trentham [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215029/daylesford-hepburn-springs/vs/UCL221074/trentham