Compare
Creswick vs Daylesford - Hepburn Springs
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 23 km apart · Creswick profile · Daylesford - Hepburn Springs profile
Creswick Daylesford - Hepburn Springs
Daylesford - Hepburn Springs and Creswick are two nearby Victorian towns with distinct profiles. Daylesford - Hepburn Springs is more highly educated and professional, with 29.1% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher and 26.3% working from home. In contrast, Creswick has a higher proportion of larger homes, with 77.2% featuring three or more bedrooms compared to 64.5% in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs. Residents in Creswick also enjoy better access to local amenities, with 86.8% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport, well above the 50.4% in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs.
Both towns have a very similar age profile, with about 30.5% of people aged 65 and over, a figure that sits well above the national average. While they share similar household sizes and rates of unpaid care, they have drifted apart in other ways since 2011. The gap in educational attainment and working-from-home rates has widened significantly, and Daylesford - Hepburn Springs has seen its share of overseas-born residents and people with no religion grow further beyond that of Creswick.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,355
- First area, 2016: 3,422
- First area, 2021: 2,794
- Second area, 2011: 2,768
- Second area, 2016: 2,139
- Second area, 2021: 3,732
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Creswick: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 85+ in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 2.7% females
- 80–84 in Creswick: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 80–84 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.4% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Creswick: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 70–74 in Creswick: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 70–74 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.2% males, 4.2% females
- 65–69 in Creswick: 3.7% males, 4.6% females; 65–69 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.0% males, 5.2% females
- 60–64 in Creswick: 3.8% males, 4.6% females; 60–64 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.5% males, 5.7% females
- 55–59 in Creswick: 3.0% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 4.4% males, 4.9% females
- 50–54 in Creswick: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 3.7% males, 4.7% females
- 45–49 in Creswick: 3.6% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.9% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Creswick: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.2% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Creswick: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.6% males, 2.1% females
- 30–34 in Creswick: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Creswick: 1.6% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Creswick: 1.8% males, 1.4% females; 20–24 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 15–19 in Creswick: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 2.3% males, 1.5% females
- 10–14 in Creswick: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Creswick: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 0–4 in Creswick: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Daylesford - Hepburn Springs: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $404
- First area, 2016: $568
- First area, 2021: $589
- Second area, 2011: $430
- Second area, 2016: $739
- Second area, 2021: $718
- First area, 2011: $714
- First area, 2016: $959
- First area, 2021: $1,072
- Second area, 2011: $751
- Second area, 2016: $1,441
- Second area, 2021: $1,205
- First area, 2011: $921
- First area, 2016: $1,237
- First area, 2021: $1,491
- Second area, 2011: $948
- Second area, 2016: $1,672
- Second area, 2021: $1,738
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $285
- First area, 2021: $275
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $340
- First area, 2011: $867
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,470
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Creswick with nearby areas
Compare Daylesford - Hepburn Springs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Creswick vs Daylesford - Hepburn Springs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215028/creswick/vs/UCL215029/daylesford-hepburn-springs