Compare
Bundamba vs Lockyer
State Electorate comparison ≈ 59 km apart · Bundamba profile · Lockyer profile
Bundamba Lockyer
Lockyer and Bundamba are distinct Queensland regions with very different characters. Lockyer is a car-dependent area where residents are far older, with a typical age of 39 compared to 30 in Bundamba. It is more likely that people here own their homes outright (32.9%) and use only English at home. In contrast, Bundamba is somewhat walkable and much more diverse; 28.1% of people were born overseas and 20.3% use a language other than English at home. Bundamba also has a far higher share of renters at 47.8% and a much younger population, with children under 15 making up 26.1% of residents.
Both areas are very similar when it comes to the typical weekly household income, which sits around $1,500. They also share a similar proportion of people with a bachelor degree or higher. While they are alike in these areas, other gaps have grown since 2011. The difference in the typical age of residents has widened from five to nine years, and the gap in overseas birth rates has increased significantly.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 47,663
- First area, 2016: 52,351
- First area, 2021: 71,499
- Second area, 2011: 47,713
- Second area, 2016: 53,503
- Second area, 2021: 52,833
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundamba: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Lockyer: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Bundamba: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Lockyer: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Bundamba: 0.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Lockyer: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Bundamba: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Lockyer: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Bundamba: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Lockyer: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Bundamba: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Lockyer: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Bundamba: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Lockyer: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Bundamba: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Lockyer: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Bundamba: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Lockyer: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Bundamba: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Lockyer: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Bundamba: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Lockyer: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Lockyer: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.5% females; 25–29 in Lockyer: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Bundamba: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Lockyer: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Bundamba: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Lockyer: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Bundamba: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Lockyer: 3.8% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Bundamba: 4.7% males, 4.4% females; 5–9 in Lockyer: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Bundamba: 4.5% males, 4.2% females; 0–4 in Lockyer: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $874
- First area, 2016: $992
- First area, 2021: $745
- Second area, 2011: $506
- Second area, 2016: $605
- Second area, 2021: $664
- First area, 2011: $1,861
- First area, 2016: $2,125
- First area, 2021: $1,529
- Second area, 2011: $1,042
- Second area, 2016: $1,302
- Second area, 2021: $1,461
- First area, 2011: $2,267
- First area, 2016: $2,541
- First area, 2021: $1,716
- Second area, 2011: $1,231
- Second area, 2016: $1,521
- Second area, 2021: $1,681
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $429
- First area, 2021: $335
- Second area, 2011: $375
- Second area, 2016: $415
- Second area, 2021: $305
- First area, 2011: $2,383
- First area, 2016: $2,200
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundamba with nearby areas
Compare Lockyer with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundamba vs Lockyer [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30010/bundamba/vs/SED30043/lockyer