Compare
Bundamba vs Ipswich
State Electorate comparison ≈ 7.2 km apart · Bundamba profile · Ipswich profile
Bundamba Ipswich
Bundamba and Ipswich are neighbouring areas with distinct profiles. Bundamba is a much younger place, with a typical resident aged 30 and 26.1% of the population being children under 15. It is also more culturally diverse; 28.1% of residents were born overseas and 20.3% use a language other than English at home. In contrast, Ipswich is older, with a typical age of 36 and a higher share of seniors. It is more convenient for pedestrians, as more homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries (74.1%) and health services (53.4%) compared to Bundamba.
Since 2011, the two areas have moved in different directions regarding their residents. The gap in overseas-born residents and those using other languages at home has widened, while the difference in the share of renters has narrowed. Despite these shifting trends, they share many similarities, such as an almost identical share of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (5.9%) and very similar typical weekly household incomes around $1,500.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 47,663
- First area, 2016: 52,351
- First area, 2021: 71,499
- Second area, 2011: 46,283
- Second area, 2016: 52,783
- Second area, 2021: 50,518
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundamba: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Ipswich: 0.7% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Bundamba: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Ipswich: 0.8% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Bundamba: 0.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Ipswich: 1.3% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Bundamba: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Ipswich: 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Bundamba: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Ipswich: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Bundamba: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Ipswich: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Bundamba: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Ipswich: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Bundamba: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Ipswich: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Bundamba: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Ipswich: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Bundamba: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Ipswich: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Bundamba: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Ipswich: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Ipswich: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 25–29 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.5% females; 25–29 in Ipswich: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Bundamba: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Ipswich: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Bundamba: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Ipswich: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Bundamba: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Ipswich: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Bundamba: 4.7% males, 4.4% females; 5–9 in Ipswich: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Bundamba: 4.5% males, 4.2% females; 0–4 in Ipswich: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $874
- First area, 2016: $992
- First area, 2021: $745
- Second area, 2011: $568
- Second area, 2016: $657
- Second area, 2021: $761
- First area, 2011: $1,861
- First area, 2016: $2,125
- First area, 2021: $1,529
- Second area, 2011: $1,144
- Second area, 2016: $1,307
- Second area, 2021: $1,481
- First area, 2011: $2,267
- First area, 2016: $2,541
- First area, 2021: $1,716
- Second area, 2011: $1,369
- Second area, 2016: $1,535
- Second area, 2021: $1,854
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $429
- First area, 2021: $335
- Second area, 2011: $220
- Second area, 2016: $275
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $2,383
- First area, 2016: $2,200
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,700
- Second area, 2021: $1,480
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundamba with nearby areas
Compare Ipswich with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundamba vs Ipswich [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30010/bundamba/vs/SED30037/ipswich