Compare
Bundamba vs Mount Ommaney
State Electorate comparison ≈ 15 km apart · Bundamba profile · Mount Ommaney profile
Bundamba Mount Ommaney
Bundamba and Mount Ommaney are nearby Queensland areas with very different profiles. Mount Ommaney is far more affluent and highly educated, with 38.2% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 12.2% in Bundamba. This is reflected in household income, with 32.1% of Mount Ommaney homes earning $3,000 or more a week, while only 12.1% of Bundamba homes do. In contrast, Bundamba has a much younger population, with a typical age of 30 compared to 39 in Mount Ommaney, and a higher share of one-parent families (23.1% versus 11.4%).
Everyday life shares several similarities, as both areas have almost identical rates of full-time employment and people providing unpaid care. They also have similar numbers of people per home and bedroom. However, the gaps between them have often grown since 2011. The age difference has widened from three to nine years, and the gap in university qualifications has flipped and grown to 26 points. While Mount Ommaney is more walkable and has more people working from home, Bundamba is closer to more schools.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 47,663
- First area, 2016: 52,351
- First area, 2021: 71,499
- Second area, 2011: 44,531
- Second area, 2016: 46,446
- Second area, 2021: 51,820
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundamba: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Mount Ommaney: 0.8% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Bundamba: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Mount Ommaney: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Bundamba: 0.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Mount Ommaney: 1.5% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Bundamba: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Mount Ommaney: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Bundamba: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Mount Ommaney: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Bundamba: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Mount Ommaney: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Bundamba: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Mount Ommaney: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Bundamba: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Mount Ommaney: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Bundamba: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Mount Ommaney: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Bundamba: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Mount Ommaney: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Bundamba: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Ommaney: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Mount Ommaney: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.5% females; 25–29 in Mount Ommaney: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Bundamba: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Mount Ommaney: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Bundamba: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Mount Ommaney: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Bundamba: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Mount Ommaney: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Bundamba: 4.7% males, 4.4% females; 5–9 in Mount Ommaney: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Bundamba: 4.5% males, 4.2% females; 0–4 in Mount Ommaney: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $874
- First area, 2016: $992
- First area, 2021: $745
- Second area, 2011: $729
- Second area, 2016: $798
- Second area, 2021: $930
- First area, 2011: $1,861
- First area, 2016: $2,125
- First area, 2021: $1,529
- Second area, 2011: $1,778
- Second area, 2016: $1,944
- Second area, 2021: $2,201
- First area, 2011: $2,267
- First area, 2016: $2,541
- First area, 2021: $1,716
- Second area, 2011: $2,015
- Second area, 2016: $2,177
- Second area, 2021: $2,511
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $429
- First area, 2021: $335
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $410
- First area, 2011: $2,383
- First area, 2016: $2,200
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundamba with nearby areas
Compare Mount Ommaney with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundamba vs Mount Ommaney [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30010/bundamba/vs/SED30058/mount-ommaney