Compare
Bundamba vs Inala
State Electorate comparison ≈ 13 km apart · Bundamba profile · Inala profile
Bundamba Inala
Bundamba and Inala are two nearby residential areas with distinct profiles. Inala is much more multicultural, with 41.6% of people born overseas and 41.0% using a language other than English at home. It is also more walkable, with a higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services (53.7% compared to 32.4% in Bundamba). In contrast, Bundamba is younger, with a typical resident aged 30 and a higher share of children under 15 at 26.1%. Bundamba has also seen a more recent influx of people, with 50.8% of residents moving there in the last five years.
Typical weekly household incomes are almost identical in both places, sitting around $1,520. This shared economic baseline exists despite other differences, such as Bundamba having a higher proportion of renters (47.8%) and a higher number of people working or looking for work (62.4%). While the two areas have tracked together on income, their cultural makeup is diverging; the gap in people born overseas has flipped since 2011, with Inala now seeing a much larger share of overseas-born residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 47,663
- First area, 2016: 52,351
- First area, 2021: 71,499
- Second area, 2011: 48,904
- Second area, 2016: 53,035
- Second area, 2021: 65,593
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundamba: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Inala: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Bundamba: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Inala: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Bundamba: 0.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Inala: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Bundamba: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Inala: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Bundamba: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Inala: 1.8% males, 2.0% females
- 60–64 in Bundamba: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Inala: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Bundamba: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Inala: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Bundamba: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Inala: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Bundamba: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Inala: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Bundamba: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Inala: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Bundamba: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Inala: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Inala: 4.4% males, 3.8% females
- 25–29 in Bundamba: 4.1% males, 4.5% females; 25–29 in Inala: 4.3% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Bundamba: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Inala: 4.0% males, 3.4% females
- 15–19 in Bundamba: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Inala: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Bundamba: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Inala: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Bundamba: 4.7% males, 4.4% females; 5–9 in Inala: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Bundamba: 4.5% males, 4.2% females; 0–4 in Inala: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $874
- First area, 2016: $992
- First area, 2021: $745
- Second area, 2011: $396
- Second area, 2016: $475
- Second area, 2021: $659
- First area, 2011: $1,861
- First area, 2016: $2,125
- First area, 2021: $1,529
- Second area, 2011: $768
- Second area, 2016: $911
- Second area, 2021: $1,511
- First area, 2011: $2,267
- First area, 2016: $2,541
- First area, 2021: $1,716
- Second area, 2011: $892
- Second area, 2016: $1,093
- Second area, 2021: $1,700
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $380
- First area, 2016: $429
- First area, 2021: $335
- Second area, 2011: $250
- Second area, 2016: $290
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,383
- First area, 2016: $2,200
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,473
- Second area, 2021: $1,600
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundamba with nearby areas
Compare Inala with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundamba vs Inala [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30010/bundamba/vs/SED30036/inala