Compare
Inala vs Mount Ommaney
State Electorate comparison ≈ 5.4 km apart · Inala profile · Mount Ommaney profile
Inala Mount Ommaney
Inala and Mount Ommaney are neighbouring areas in Brisbane with very different profiles. Inala is much more linguistically diverse, with 41.0% of people using a language other than English at home, compared to 23.3% in Mount Ommaney. There is also a significant gap in income and education; the typical weekly household income in Mount Ommaney is $2,201, which is $690 higher than the $1,511 typical in Inala. This is consistent with a higher share of university degrees in Mount Ommaney, where 38.2% of adults have a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 18.8% in Inala.
Both areas are effectively alike when it comes to their local layouts, with about 75% of homes having a 15-minute-city walkshed. This shared accessibility exists alongside changing trends between the two places. The gap in school completion has narrowed since 2011, while the difference in the number of people who work from home has widened. The typical age of residents has also shifted, with people in Mount Ommaney now noticeably older than those in Inala.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 48,904
- First area, 2016: 53,035
- First area, 2021: 65,593
- Second area, 2011: 44,531
- Second area, 2016: 46,446
- Second area, 2021: 51,820
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 48 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Inala: 0.5% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Mount Ommaney: 0.8% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Inala: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Mount Ommaney: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Inala: 1.0% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Mount Ommaney: 1.5% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Inala: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Mount Ommaney: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Inala: 1.8% males, 2.0% females; 65–69 in Mount Ommaney: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Inala: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Mount Ommaney: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Inala: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Mount Ommaney: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Inala: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Mount Ommaney: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Inala: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Mount Ommaney: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Inala: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Mount Ommaney: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Inala: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Mount Ommaney: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Inala: 4.4% males, 3.8% females; 30–34 in Mount Ommaney: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Inala: 4.3% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Mount Ommaney: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Inala: 4.0% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Mount Ommaney: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Inala: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Mount Ommaney: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Inala: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Mount Ommaney: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Inala: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Mount Ommaney: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Inala: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Mount Ommaney: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $396
- First area, 2016: $475
- First area, 2021: $659
- Second area, 2011: $729
- Second area, 2016: $798
- Second area, 2021: $930
- First area, 2011: $768
- First area, 2016: $911
- First area, 2021: $1,511
- Second area, 2011: $1,778
- Second area, 2016: $1,944
- Second area, 2021: $2,201
- First area, 2011: $892
- First area, 2016: $1,093
- First area, 2021: $1,700
- Second area, 2011: $2,015
- Second area, 2016: $2,177
- Second area, 2021: $2,511
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $290
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $410
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,473
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Inala with nearby areas
Compare Mount Ommaney with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Inala vs Mount Ommaney [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30036/inala/vs/SED30058/mount-ommaney