Compare
Chapman vs Waramanga
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.2 km apart · Chapman profile · Waramanga profile
Chapman Waramanga
Chapman and Waramanga are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory with similar populations. Chapman is a wealthier and older area, where the typical resident is 47 and typical weekly household income is $3,111. It has a much higher share of detached houses (89.9%) and homes owned outright (48.7%) compared to Waramanga. In contrast, Waramanga is younger, with a typical age of 38, and is more walkable, with 100% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services. Waramanga also has a higher proportion of renters (27.5%) and recent overseas arrivals (13.8%).
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, including similar unemployment rates and an almost identical share of people born overseas. They also have nearly the same number of public transport stops and similar access to transit. However, the age gap between the two is growing, with residents in Chapman becoming far older than those in Waramanga since 2011. While both areas sit above the national figure for typical incomes, the gap in household earnings has narrowed slightly over the last decade.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,723
- First area, 2016: 2,684
- First area, 2021: 2,867
- Second area, 2011: 2,597
- Second area, 2016: 2,629
- Second area, 2021: 2,785
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Waramanga: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Chapman: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Waramanga: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 75–79 in Waramanga: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Waramanga: 1.9% males, 3.3% females
- 65–69 in Chapman: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Waramanga: 2.5% males, 1.8% females
- 60–64 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Waramanga: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Waramanga: 2.8% males, 1.7% females
- 50–54 in Chapman: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Waramanga: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Waramanga: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Chapman: 2.7% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Waramanga: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Chapman: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Waramanga: 4.1% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 30–34 in Waramanga: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Chapman: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Waramanga: 2.4% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Chapman: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Waramanga: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Waramanga: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Chapman: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Waramanga: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Chapman: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Waramanga: 3.7% males, 4.1% females
- 0–4 in Chapman: 1.9% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Waramanga: 3.1% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,030
- First area, 2016: $1,188
- First area, 2021: $1,378
- Second area, 2011: $903
- Second area, 2016: $991
- Second area, 2021: $1,179
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,697
- First area, 2021: $3,111
- Second area, 2011: $1,677
- Second area, 2016: $1,875
- Second area, 2021: $2,247
- First area, 2011: $2,813
- First area, 2016: $3,192
- First area, 2021: $3,490
- Second area, 2011: $2,180
- Second area, 2016: $2,503
- Second area, 2021: $2,920
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $455
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $305
- Second area, 2021: $379
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,500
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,024
- Second area, 2016: $2,137
- Second area, 2021: $2,175
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Chapman with nearby areas
Compare Waramanga with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chapman vs Waramanga [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801081091/chapman/vs/801081097/waramanga