Compare
Chapman vs Stirling
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 1.3 km apart · Chapman profile · Stirling profile
Chapman Stirling
Chapman and Stirling are neighbouring areas in the ACT with similar population sizes. Chapman is lapped by higher levels of education and income, with 49.4% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 36.6% in Stirling. This is consistent with the typical weekly household income, which is well higher in Chapman at $3,111 against $2,206 in Stirling. Stirling is more accessible for pedestrians, as 100% of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of schools, health services, and groceries, while Chapman is far lower across these measures.
Both areas sit near the national figure for people needing help with daily activities. They also share similar household sizes, with about 2.6 to 2.7 people per home. While they have much in common, the gaps in income and qualifications have widened since 2011. At the same time, the difference in the share of people who rent has narrowed over the last decade.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,723
- First area, 2016: 2,684
- First area, 2021: 2,867
- Second area, 2011: 2,085
- Second area, 2016: 2,134
- Second area, 2021: 2,191
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Stirling: 2.1% males, 3.9% females
- 80–84 in Chapman: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Stirling: 1.4% males, 2.3% females
- 75–79 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 75–79 in Stirling: 2.1% males, 3.0% females
- 70–74 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Stirling: 3.4% males, 4.1% females
- 65–69 in Chapman: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Stirling: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Chapman: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Stirling: 2.1% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Stirling: 2.1% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Chapman: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Stirling: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Chapman: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Stirling: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Chapman: 2.7% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Stirling: 2.6% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Chapman: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Stirling: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Chapman: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 30–34 in Stirling: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 25–29 in Chapman: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Stirling: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Chapman: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Stirling: 2.5% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in Chapman: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Stirling: 3.0% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Chapman: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Stirling: 4.4% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Chapman: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Stirling: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Chapman: 1.9% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Stirling: 2.9% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,030
- First area, 2016: $1,188
- First area, 2021: $1,378
- Second area, 2011: $834
- Second area, 2016: $881
- Second area, 2021: $1,020
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,697
- First area, 2021: $3,111
- Second area, 2011: $1,752
- Second area, 2016: $1,963
- Second area, 2021: $2,206
- First area, 2011: $2,813
- First area, 2016: $3,192
- First area, 2021: $3,490
- Second area, 2011: $2,127
- Second area, 2016: $2,303
- Second area, 2021: $2,759
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $455
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $385
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $460
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,500
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,258
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Chapman with nearby areas
Compare Stirling with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chapman vs Stirling [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801081091/chapman/vs/801081096/stirling