Compare
Waramanga vs Chifley
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 1.3 km apart · Waramanga profile · Chifley profile
Waramanga Chifley
Waramanga and Chifley are neighbouring areas with similar population sizes, but they differ in their diversity and accessibility. Chifley has a far higher share of people using another language at home (25.7% compared to 15.0% in Waramanga) and more recent arrivals from overseas (24.1% versus 13.8%). In contrast, Waramanga is far more connected to public transport, with 100% of homes within a 10 minute walk of a stop and far more frequent departures per 1,000 people. Waramanga also has a much higher share of people who speak a First Nations language (24.6% versus 8.5%).
Both areas sit near the national figure for people born overseas, with 21.7% in Waramanga and 30.1% in Chifley. They are also very alike in terms of typical weekly household income, which is around $2,247 to $2,347. Over time, some gaps have widened; Chifley has seen a rise in adults with a bachelor degree or higher, while Waramanga has a growing lead in the share of people who are volunteers.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,597
- First area, 2016: 2,629
- First area, 2021: 2,785
- Second area, 2011: 2,489
- Second area, 2016: 2,407
- Second area, 2021: 2,680
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Waramanga: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Chifley: 0.8% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Waramanga: 1.3% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Chifley: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Waramanga: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Chifley: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Waramanga: 1.9% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Chifley: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Waramanga: 2.5% males, 1.8% females; 65–69 in Chifley: 1.8% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Waramanga: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Chifley: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Waramanga: 2.8% males, 1.7% females; 55–59 in Chifley: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Waramanga: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Chifley: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Waramanga: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Chifley: 3.1% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Waramanga: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Chifley: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Waramanga: 4.1% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Chifley: 3.9% males, 4.6% females
- 30–34 in Waramanga: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 30–34 in Chifley: 5.0% males, 4.9% females
- 25–29 in Waramanga: 2.4% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Chifley: 4.3% males, 4.6% females
- 20–24 in Waramanga: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Chifley: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Waramanga: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Chifley: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Waramanga: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Chifley: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Waramanga: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 5–9 in Chifley: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Waramanga: 3.1% males, 3.6% females; 0–4 in Chifley: 2.5% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $903
- First area, 2016: $991
- First area, 2021: $1,179
- Second area, 2011: $861
- Second area, 2016: $971
- Second area, 2021: $1,191
- First area, 2011: $1,677
- First area, 2016: $1,875
- First area, 2021: $2,247
- Second area, 2011: $1,629
- Second area, 2016: $1,843
- Second area, 2021: $2,347
- First area, 2011: $2,180
- First area, 2016: $2,503
- First area, 2021: $2,920
- Second area, 2011: $2,117
- Second area, 2016: $2,386
- Second area, 2021: $2,940
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $300
- First area, 2016: $305
- First area, 2021: $379
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $361
- Second area, 2021: $450
- First area, 2011: $2,024
- First area, 2016: $2,137
- First area, 2021: $2,175
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,383
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Waramanga with nearby areas
Compare Chifley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Waramanga vs Chifley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801081097/waramanga/vs/801091099/chifley