Compare
Chisholm vs Conder
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.5 km apart · Chisholm profile · Conder profile
Chisholm Conder
Chisholm and Conder are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory. They differ most in their access to services and housing styles. Conder has far more schools and a higher number of schools per 1,000 children. It is also more walkable, with more homes within a 15-minute walk of health services and groceries. Chisholm is more dominated by separate houses, which make up 95.8% of its homes, compared to 80.7% in Conder.
Since 2011, the gaps between these two areas have shifted in several ways. The difference in high-income households has widened, with Conder now seeing a higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week. Meanwhile, the gap in home ownership has narrowed slightly. Despite these changes, the two areas remain very similar in their typical resident age of 37 and their shared proportion of First Nations people at 3.2%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,238
- First area, 2016: 5,121
- First area, 2021: 5,268
- Second area, 2011: 5,313
- Second area, 2016: 5,059
- Second area, 2021: 5,108
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Conder: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Conder: 0.6% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Conder: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Conder: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Conder: 2.2% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Conder: 2.9% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 55–59 in Conder: 3.9% males, 4.3% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Conder: 4.2% males, 4.9% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Conder: 3.3% males, 3.8% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Conder: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Conder: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Conder: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Conder: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Conder: 3.9% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Conder: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Conder: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Conder: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Conder: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $850
- First area, 2016: $919
- First area, 2021: $1,088
- Second area, 2011: $904
- Second area, 2016: $946
- Second area, 2021: $1,179
- First area, 2011: $1,958
- First area, 2016: $2,028
- First area, 2021: $2,292
- Second area, 2011: $2,150
- Second area, 2016: $2,226
- Second area, 2021: $2,574
- First area, 2011: $2,194
- First area, 2016: $2,291
- First area, 2021: $2,570
- Second area, 2011: $2,314
- Second area, 2016: $2,479
- Second area, 2021: $2,907
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,123
- Second area, 2016: $2,087
- Second area, 2021: $2,148
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Conder with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Conder [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801071074/chisholm/vs/801071075/conder