Compare
Chisholm vs Gilmore
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 1.7 km apart · Chisholm profile · Gilmore profile
Chisholm Gilmore
Chisholm and Gilmore are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory. Chisholm has a larger population and more businesses, with 267 compared to 120 in Gilmore. The two differ most in how people get around and access services; for example, 66.0% of Gilmore homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 37.6% of Chisholm homes are. Gilmore also has a higher share of people speaking a First Nations language (9.9% versus 3.0% in Chisholm) and a higher First Nations unemployment rate (13.3% versus 5.8% in Chisholm).
Since 2011, the gap in high-income households has widened, with Gilmore now having a 4.1 percentage point higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week. This shift comes as both areas remain very similar in other ways, such as having the same typical resident age of 37 and an equal share of adults with a bachelor degree (23.4%). Both areas also have a very high proportion of separate houses, although this is slightly more common in Chisholm.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,238
- First area, 2016: 5,121
- First area, 2021: 5,268
- Second area, 2011: 2,843
- Second area, 2016: 2,750
- Second area, 2021: 2,706
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Gilmore: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Gilmore: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Gilmore: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Gilmore: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 55–59 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Gilmore: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Gilmore: 4.3% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $850
- First area, 2016: $919
- First area, 2021: $1,088
- Second area, 2011: $862
- Second area, 2016: $957
- Second area, 2021: $1,164
- First area, 2011: $1,958
- First area, 2016: $2,028
- First area, 2021: $2,292
- Second area, 2011: $1,874
- Second area, 2016: $2,161
- Second area, 2021: $2,416
- First area, 2011: $2,194
- First area, 2016: $2,291
- First area, 2021: $2,570
- Second area, 2011: $2,106
- Second area, 2016: $2,371
- Second area, 2021: $2,725
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $370
- Second area, 2016: $375
- Second area, 2021: $430
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,037
- Second area, 2021: $2,048
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Gilmore with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Gilmore [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801071074/chisholm/vs/801071077/gilmore