Compare
Chisholm vs Fadden
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.4 km apart · Chisholm profile · Fadden profile
Chisholm Fadden
Chisholm and Fadden are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory. Fadden is a high-earning area where 44.9% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 23.4% in Chisholm. This higher level of qualification is consistent with incomes in Fadden, where 51.9% of households earn $3,000 or more a week, well above the 32.0% in Chisholm. However, Chisholm is much more walkable; for example, 37.6% of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 3.3% of homes in Fadden have that same access.
These two places are almost identical when it comes to the types of homes they have, as detached houses make up over 95% of both areas. While they share a similar housing style, the gap in typical weekly household income has widened since 2011, now sitting at $1,010. Other differences have also grown over time, such as the share of people aged 65 and over, which is now 5.9 percentage points higher in Fadden than in Chisholm.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,238
- First area, 2016: 5,121
- First area, 2021: 5,268
- Second area, 2011: 3,083
- Second area, 2016: 2,949
- Second area, 2021: 3,006
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Fadden: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Fadden: 0.5% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Fadden: 1.7% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Fadden: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Fadden: 3.7% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Fadden: 4.0% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 55–59 in Fadden: 3.2% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Fadden: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Fadden: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Fadden: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Fadden: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Fadden: 2.6% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Fadden: 2.0% males, 1.1% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Fadden: 2.8% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Fadden: 3.5% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Fadden: 3.2% males, 3.9% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Fadden: 3.0% males, 4.0% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Fadden: 3.1% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $850
- First area, 2016: $919
- First area, 2021: $1,088
- Second area, 2011: $1,055
- Second area, 2016: $1,197
- Second area, 2021: $1,415
- First area, 2011: $1,958
- First area, 2016: $2,028
- First area, 2021: $2,292
- Second area, 2011: $2,692
- Second area, 2016: $2,757
- Second area, 2021: $3,302
- First area, 2011: $2,194
- First area, 2016: $2,291
- First area, 2021: $2,570
- Second area, 2011: $2,812
- Second area, 2016: $3,009
- Second area, 2021: $3,557
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $500
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $620
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,299
- Second area, 2021: $2,383
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Fadden with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Fadden [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801071074/chisholm/vs/801071076/fadden