Compare
Conder vs Richardson
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 3.5 km apart · Conder profile · Richardson profile
Conder Richardson
Conder and Richardson are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory with different profiles. Conder is generally more affluent, with a typical weekly household income of $2,574 compared to $2,043 in Richardson. It also has more people with university degrees (24.3% versus 19.3%) and a larger school system, including three schools and larger average class sizes. Richardson is more dominated by separate houses, which make up 96.1% of its homes, compared to 80.7% in Conder.
Since 2011, the gaps between these two areas have shifted, with the difference in high-earning households and typical incomes widening. They do share many common traits, such as having almost the same proportion of children under 15 and similar rates of long-term health conditions. Both areas also sit well above the national figure for homes with three or more bedrooms, with over 94% of households in each area having at least three.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,313
- First area, 2016: 5,059
- First area, 2021: 5,108
- Second area, 2011: 3,133
- Second area, 2016: 3,006
- Second area, 2021: 3,058
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Conder: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Richardson: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Conder: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Richardson: 0.7% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Conder: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Richardson: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Conder: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Richardson: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Conder: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Richardson: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Conder: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Richardson: 2.9% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Conder: 3.9% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Richardson: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Conder: 4.2% males, 4.9% females; 50–54 in Richardson: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Conder: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Richardson: 3.3% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Conder: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Conder: 3.7% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Conder: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 25–29 in Conder: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Richardson: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Conder: 3.9% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Richardson: 3.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Conder: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 15–19 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Conder: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Conder: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Conder: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Richardson: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $904
- First area, 2016: $946
- First area, 2021: $1,179
- Second area, 2011: $781
- Second area, 2016: $863
- Second area, 2021: $1,012
- First area, 2011: $2,150
- First area, 2016: $2,226
- First area, 2021: $2,574
- Second area, 2011: $1,632
- Second area, 2016: $1,840
- Second area, 2021: $2,043
- First area, 2011: $2,314
- First area, 2016: $2,479
- First area, 2021: $2,907
- Second area, 2011: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $2,061
- Second area, 2021: $2,327
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $360
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $390
- Second area, 2011: $272
- Second area, 2016: $325
- Second area, 2021: $391
- First area, 2011: $2,123
- First area, 2016: $2,087
- First area, 2021: $2,148
- Second area, 2011: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Conder with nearby areas
Compare Richardson with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Conder vs Richardson [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801071075/conder/vs/801071087/richardson