Compare
Chisholm vs Macarthur
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Chisholm profile · Macarthur profile
Chisholm Macarthur
Chisholm and Macarthur are neighbouring areas in the ACT with distinct economic and educational profiles. Macarthur has a much more highly qualified workforce, with 36.3% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 23.4% in Chisholm. This higher level of education is consistent with higher incomes; the typical household in Macarthur earns $3,037 a week, which is well higher than the $2,292 typical in Chisholm. Macarthur also has a far higher share of homes owned outright at 42.4%, while Chisholm is more connected by public transport, with 100% of homes within a 10-minute walk of a stop.
Both areas are somewhat walkable and have very similar family structures, with children under 15 making up about 21% of the population in each. While they share these basics, other gaps are shifting. The difference in university qualifications has widened since 2011, and Chisholm has seen a rise in people using a language other than English at home. In contrast, the gap in typical household incomes has narrowed slightly over the same period.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,238
- First area, 2016: 5,121
- First area, 2021: 5,268
- Second area, 2011: 1,460
- Second area, 2016: 1,427
- Second area, 2021: 1,405
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Macarthur: 0.4% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Macarthur: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Macarthur: 1.1% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Macarthur: 3.1% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Macarthur: 3.2% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Macarthur: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 55–59 in Macarthur: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Macarthur: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Macarthur: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Macarthur: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Macarthur: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Macarthur: 2.7% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Macarthur: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Macarthur: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Macarthur: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.0% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Macarthur: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Macarthur: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Macarthur: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $850
- First area, 2016: $919
- First area, 2021: $1,088
- Second area, 2011: $1,033
- Second area, 2016: $1,133
- Second area, 2021: $1,334
- First area, 2011: $1,958
- First area, 2016: $2,028
- First area, 2021: $2,292
- Second area, 2011: $2,729
- Second area, 2016: $2,680
- Second area, 2021: $3,037
- First area, 2011: $2,194
- First area, 2016: $2,291
- First area, 2021: $2,570
- Second area, 2011: $2,771
- Second area, 2016: $2,856
- Second area, 2021: $3,232
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $445
- Second area, 2016: $450
- Second area, 2021: $520
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,200
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,200
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Macarthur with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Macarthur [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801071074/chisholm/vs/801071083/macarthur