Compare
Claremont vs Mosman Park
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 4.2 km apart · Claremont profile · Mosman Park profile
Claremont Mosman Park
Claremont and Mosman Park are neighbouring suburbs in Perth with similar high-income profiles, though they differ in how people live and move. Claremont is more urbanised, with typical weekly rents far higher at $485 compared to $300 in Mosman Park. It is also a hub for education and travel, with far more public transport routes and larger average school sizes. Mosman Park has a more residential feel, with separate houses being far more common than in Claremont.
The gap in typical weekly rents has widened since 2011, reflecting the different housing mixes of the two areas. Despite this, they share much in common, including similar levels of overseas-born residents and nearly identical typical weekly household incomes. Both areas are well above the national figure for adults with a bachelor degree or higher, and they both have about the same number of schools.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,280
- First area, 2016: 10,054
- First area, 2021: 11,284
- Second area, 2011: 8,598
- Second area, 2016: 8,757
- Second area, 2021: 9,169
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Claremont: 1.7% males, 3.1% females; 85+ in Mosman Park: 0.9% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Claremont: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Mosman Park: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Mosman Park: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Mosman Park: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Claremont: 2.4% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Mosman Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Claremont: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Claremont: 2.6% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Mosman Park: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Claremont: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 50–54 in Mosman Park: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 45–49 in Claremont: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Mosman Park: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Claremont: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Mosman Park: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Claremont: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Mosman Park: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Claremont: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Mosman Park: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Claremont: 4.2% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Mosman Park: 2.7% males, 4.3% females
- 10–14 in Claremont: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Mosman Park: 3.0% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Claremont: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Mosman Park: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Claremont: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 0–4 in Mosman Park: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $826
- First area, 2016: $960
- First area, 2021: $1,142
- Second area, 2011: $747
- Second area, 2016: $894
- Second area, 2021: $1,030
- First area, 2011: $1,789
- First area, 2016: $2,073
- First area, 2021: $2,252
- Second area, 2011: $1,497
- Second area, 2016: $1,864
- Second area, 2021: $2,132
- First area, 2011: $2,612
- First area, 2016: $2,989
- First area, 2021: $3,388
- Second area, 2011: $2,555
- Second area, 2016: $2,887
- Second area, 2021: $3,456
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $398
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $485
- Second area, 2011: $285
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $2,700
- First area, 2016: $2,600
- First area, 2021: $3,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,582
- Second area, 2016: $2,700
- Second area, 2021: $3,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Claremont with nearby areas
Compare Mosman Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Claremont vs Mosman Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA51750/claremont/vs/LGA55740/mosman-park