Compare
Mosman Park vs Nedlands
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 4.9 km apart · Mosman Park profile · Nedlands profile
Mosman Park Nedlands
Nedlands and Mosman Park are neighbouring areas in Perth with very high levels of wealth, though their housing and lifestyles differ. Nedlands has a higher proportion of large detached houses (81.6%) and more homes owned outright (45.0%) than Mosman Park. It also has a higher share of high-earning households, with 48.4% earning $3,000 or more a week, compared to 36.9% in Mosman Park. In contrast, Mosman Park has more people living alone (32.6% compared to 19.5%) and a higher share of renters (33.9% versus 21.7%).
The gap in high weekly earnings has widened since 2011, but the two areas remain very similar in other ways. Both have about a third of their population born overseas and very similar unemployment rates, around 4%. They also share the same top score for access to money and resources. While Nedlands is closer to the city and has more public transport, Mosman Park has more homes within a 15-minute walk of health services (72.0% compared to 52.2%) and groceries.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 8,598
- First area, 2016: 8,757
- First area, 2021: 9,169
- Second area, 2011: 20,534
- Second area, 2016: 21,121
- Second area, 2021: 22,132
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mosman Park: 0.9% males, 1.4% females; 85+ in Nedlands: 1.2% males, 1.8% females
- 80–84 in Mosman Park: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Nedlands: 1.3% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Mosman Park: 2.1% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Nedlands: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Mosman Park: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Nedlands: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Mosman Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Nedlands: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Nedlands: 2.9% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Mosman Park: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Nedlands: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Mosman Park: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Nedlands: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 45–49 in Mosman Park: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Nedlands: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Mosman Park: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Nedlands: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Nedlands: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Mosman Park: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Nedlands: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in Mosman Park: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Nedlands: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Nedlands: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Mosman Park: 2.7% males, 4.3% females; 15–19 in Nedlands: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Mosman Park: 3.0% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Nedlands: 4.3% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Mosman Park: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Nedlands: 3.6% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Mosman Park: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Nedlands: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $747
- First area, 2016: $894
- First area, 2021: $1,030
- Second area, 2011: $818
- Second area, 2016: $987
- Second area, 2021: $1,178
- First area, 2011: $1,497
- First area, 2016: $1,864
- First area, 2021: $2,132
- Second area, 2011: $2,490
- Second area, 2016: $2,708
- Second area, 2021: $3,226
- First area, 2011: $2,555
- First area, 2016: $2,887
- First area, 2021: $3,456
- Second area, 2011: $2,779
- Second area, 2016: $3,559
- Second area, 2021: $4,244
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $285
- First area, 2016: $320
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $430
- Second area, 2016: $520
- Second area, 2021: $520
- First area, 2011: $2,582
- First area, 2016: $2,700
- First area, 2021: $3,000
- Second area, 2011: $3,000
- Second area, 2016: $3,250
- Second area, 2021: $3,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Mosman Park with nearby areas
Compare Nedlands with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mosman Park vs Nedlands [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA55740/mosman-park/vs/LGA56580/nedlands