Compare
Cottesloe vs Mosman Park
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 2.5 km apart · Cottesloe profile · Mosman Park profile
Cottesloe Mosman Park
Mosman Park and Cottesloe are neighbouring areas in Western Australia. Cottesloe has a higher typical household income of $3,303 compared to $2,132 in Mosman Park, and a far higher share of homes owned outright at 44.5% against 34.3%. Mosman Park is more diverse, with a well higher share of people born overseas (32.2% versus 24.6%) and more people using another language at home. Education differs too, as Mosman Park has far more schools and far larger average school sizes than Cottesloe.
Everyday life in both places is quite similar. They have almost identical rates of full-time employment, very similar numbers of people per home, and roughly the same share of residents who have moved recently. However, some gaps have grown since 2011. The difference in typical weekly rent has widened to $235, and the gap in typical family income has increased significantly to $1,141.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,605
- First area, 2016: 7,597
- First area, 2021: 7,970
- Second area, 2011: 8,598
- Second area, 2016: 8,757
- Second area, 2021: 9,169
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cottesloe: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Mosman Park: 0.9% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Cottesloe: 1.2% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Mosman Park: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Cottesloe: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Mosman Park: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Cottesloe: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Mosman Park: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Cottesloe: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Mosman Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Cottesloe: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Cottesloe: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Mosman Park: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Cottesloe: 3.7% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Mosman Park: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 45–49 in Cottesloe: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Mosman Park: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Mosman Park: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Cottesloe: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Cottesloe: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Mosman Park: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Mosman Park: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Cottesloe: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Mosman Park: 2.7% males, 4.3% females
- 10–14 in Cottesloe: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Mosman Park: 3.0% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Cottesloe: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Mosman Park: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Cottesloe: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Mosman Park: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,024
- First area, 2016: $1,218
- First area, 2021: $1,447
- Second area, 2011: $747
- Second area, 2016: $894
- Second area, 2021: $1,030
- First area, 2011: $2,409
- First area, 2016: $2,631
- First area, 2021: $3,303
- Second area, 2011: $1,497
- Second area, 2016: $1,864
- Second area, 2021: $2,132
- First area, 2011: $2,799
- First area, 2016: $3,659
- First area, 2021: $4,597
- Second area, 2011: $2,555
- Second area, 2016: $2,887
- Second area, 2021: $3,456
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $450
- First area, 2016: $540
- First area, 2021: $535
- Second area, 2011: $285
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $3,000
- First area, 2016: $3,250
- First area, 2021: $3,835
- Second area, 2011: $2,582
- Second area, 2016: $2,700
- Second area, 2021: $3,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cottesloe with nearby areas
Compare Mosman Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cottesloe vs Mosman Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA52170/cottesloe/vs/LGA55740/mosman-park