Compare
Claremont vs Cottesloe
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 2.6 km apart · Claremont profile · Cottesloe profile
Claremont Cottesloe
Claremont and Cottesloe are neighbouring areas in Greater Perth. Claremont has a much larger school presence, with 5 schools compared to just 1 in Cottesloe, and its average school size is far higher at 972 students. Cottesloe is more likely to have separate houses, at 68.6% compared to 47.1% in Claremont. There are also stark contrasts between First Nations residents; for example, the typical First Nations resident in Cottesloe is far older at 35, while in Claremont they are just 16.
Income gaps between the two have widened since 2011, with the typical household income in Cottesloe now well higher at $3,303 compared to $2,252 in Claremont. Despite this, both areas are among the most advantaged in Australia, scoring a 10 out of 10 for access to money and resources. They share a similar population growth of around 12% since 2021 and have almost identical shares of children under 15 years old.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,280
- First area, 2016: 10,054
- First area, 2021: 11,284
- Second area, 2011: 7,605
- Second area, 2016: 7,597
- Second area, 2021: 7,970
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Claremont: 1.7% males, 3.1% females; 85+ in Cottesloe: 1.2% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Claremont: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Cottesloe: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Cottesloe: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Cottesloe: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Claremont: 2.4% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Cottesloe: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Claremont: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Cottesloe: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Claremont: 2.6% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Cottesloe: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Claremont: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 50–54 in Cottesloe: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 45–49 in Claremont: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Cottesloe: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Claremont: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Cottesloe: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Claremont: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Cottesloe: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Claremont: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Claremont: 4.2% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Cottesloe: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Claremont: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Cottesloe: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Claremont: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Cottesloe: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Claremont: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 0–4 in Cottesloe: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $826
- First area, 2016: $960
- First area, 2021: $1,142
- Second area, 2011: $1,024
- Second area, 2016: $1,218
- Second area, 2021: $1,447
- First area, 2011: $1,789
- First area, 2016: $2,073
- First area, 2021: $2,252
- Second area, 2011: $2,409
- Second area, 2016: $2,631
- Second area, 2021: $3,303
- First area, 2011: $2,612
- First area, 2016: $2,989
- First area, 2021: $3,388
- Second area, 2011: $2,799
- Second area, 2016: $3,659
- Second area, 2021: $4,597
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $398
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $485
- Second area, 2011: $450
- Second area, 2016: $540
- Second area, 2021: $535
- First area, 2011: $2,700
- First area, 2016: $2,600
- First area, 2021: $3,000
- Second area, 2011: $3,000
- Second area, 2016: $3,250
- Second area, 2021: $3,835
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Claremont with nearby areas
Compare Cottesloe with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Claremont vs Cottesloe [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA51750/claremont/vs/LGA52170/cottesloe