Compare
Lithgow vs Mid-Western Regional
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 81 km apart · Lithgow profile · Mid-Western Regional profile
Lithgow Mid-Western Regional
Mid-Western Regional and Lithgow are two New South Wales areas with different layouts and profiles. Mid-Western Regional is more advantaged, with a higher score for access to money and resources (7 against 3 in Lithgow) and a higher share of people who finished Year 12. It also has a younger population, with 19.9% of residents being children under 15, compared to 16.4% in Lithgow. In contrast, Lithgow is far more walkable; 55.1% of its homes are in a 15-minute-city walkshed, compared to 34.2% in Mid-Western Regional.
Both areas sit near the national average for overall advantage. This shared standing exists alongside diverging demographics, as the gap in the number of seniors has grown since 2011, with Lithgow now having a well higher share of people aged 65 and over (24.5% compared to 20.7%). Lithgow also provides much more frequent public transport, with 392.3 weekly departures per 1,000 people, while Mid-Western Regional has 52.7.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 20,160
- First area, 2016: 21,090
- First area, 2021: 20,842
- Second area, 2011: 22,318
- Second area, 2016: 24,076
- Second area, 2021: 25,713
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lithgow: 0.9% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Mid-Western Regional: 0.9% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Lithgow: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Mid-Western Regional: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Lithgow: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Mid-Western Regional: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Lithgow: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 70–74 in Mid-Western Regional: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Lithgow: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 65–69 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Lithgow: 3.9% males, 3.8% females; 60–64 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Lithgow: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Lithgow: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Lithgow: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Mid-Western Regional: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Lithgow: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Mid-Western Regional: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Lithgow: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Lithgow: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Lithgow: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Mid-Western Regional: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Lithgow: 2.7% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Mid-Western Regional: 2.3% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Lithgow: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Lithgow: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Lithgow: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 0–4 in Lithgow: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Mid-Western Regional: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $450
- First area, 2016: $510
- First area, 2021: $632
- Second area, 2011: $449
- Second area, 2016: $547
- Second area, 2021: $703
- First area, 2011: $896
- First area, 2016: $984
- First area, 2021: $1,196
- Second area, 2011: $929
- Second area, 2016: $1,131
- Second area, 2021: $1,486
- First area, 2011: $1,190
- First area, 2016: $1,328
- First area, 2021: $1,658
- Second area, 2011: $1,204
- Second area, 2016: $1,433
- Second area, 2021: $1,966
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $170
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $270
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $270
- Second area, 2021: $330
- First area, 2011: $1,452
- First area, 2016: $1,387
- First area, 2021: $1,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,551
- Second area, 2016: $1,690
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Lithgow with nearby areas
Compare Mid-Western Regional with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lithgow vs Mid-Western Regional [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA14870/lithgow/vs/LGA15270/mid-western-regional