Mid-Western Regional · Council (LGA)

Walkability in Mid-Western Regional

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A typical slope of 6.5% means the terrain in Mid-Western Regional is about the same as the state average, but the area remains mostly car-dependent. Only 34.2% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, a figure far below the New South Wales average of 71.9%. This means most residents rely on vehicles for their daily needs.

Open map →
📍 Mid-Western Regional, Council (LGA)

Where Mid-Western Regional sits — Walkability score

3.0 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 8 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 7 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 6 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 11 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 18 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 25 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 37 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 36 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 45 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 58 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 58 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 45 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 24 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 35 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 19 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 13 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 11 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 7 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 10 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 10 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 12 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 13 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 10 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 7 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All council (lga) areas, 2021. The marker is Mid-Western Regional — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Mid-Western Regional3.0
Rest of NSW 4.6
New South Wales 6.2

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Mid-Western Regional by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for the area is 3.0, which is far below the New South Wales figure of 6.2. Residents have far fewer amenity types within a 15-minute walk compared to the state average.

3.0

Mostly car-dependent of council (lga) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.0

Lower than 76% of council (lga) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

34.2%

Lower than 75% of council (lga) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to essentials is far below state levels, with parks being the most reachable amenity at 54.4% of homes. In contrast, health services are the hardest to reach, with only 16.7% of homes within a 15-minute walk.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

Street connectivity is recorded at 0 intersections per square kilometre. There are 14.6 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is about the same as the state figure.

14.6

Lower than 68% of council (lga) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.5%

Higher than 75% of council (lga) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Mid-Western Regional

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Mid-Western Regional [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/lga/LGA15270/mid-western-regional/topic/walkability