Compare
Dales Creek vs Mount Egerton
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 21 km apart · Dales Creek profile · Mount Egerton profile
Dales Creek Mount Egerton
Dales Creek (L) and Mount Egerton (L) are two nearby Victorian areas with small populations. Mount Egerton (L) is much more walkable, with 85.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to 0% in Dales Creek (L), which is car-dependent. There are also striking differences in how people live and work: 20.9% of Mount Egerton (L) residents work from home, far higher than the 10.4% in Dales Creek (L), and 37.5% of Mount Egerton (L) residents moved there in the last five years compared to just 21.4% in Dales Creek (L).
Both areas have similar typical weekly family incomes and a nearly identical share of people with no religion, which sits close to the national figure. They also share the same housing style, with 100% of homes being separate houses. While they are alike in these ways, other gaps have grown since 2011, such as the difference in home ownership and the share of people working from home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 336
- First area, 2016: 379
- First area, 2021: 403
- Second area, 2011: 218
- Second area, 2016: 461
- Second area, 2021: 322
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 54 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Dales Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Egerton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Dales Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Egerton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Dales Creek: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Egerton: 2.4% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Dales Creek: 3.0% males, 3.8% females; 70–74 in Mount Egerton: 0.9% males, 3.3% females
- 65–69 in Dales Creek: 2.0% males, 0.8% females; 65–69 in Mount Egerton: 4.5% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Dales Creek: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Mount Egerton: 5.6% males, 1.5% females
- 55–59 in Dales Creek: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Mount Egerton: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 50–54 in Dales Creek: 4.6% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Mount Egerton: 3.9% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Dales Creek: 5.8% males, 4.8% females; 45–49 in Mount Egerton: 4.7% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Dales Creek: 3.3% males, 5.6% females; 40–44 in Mount Egerton: 2.7% males, 5.0% females
- 35–39 in Dales Creek: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Mount Egerton: 5.0% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Dales Creek: 2.5% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Mount Egerton: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Dales Creek: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Mount Egerton: 1.2% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Dales Creek: 2.3% males, 1.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Egerton: 3.9% males, 1.2% females
- 15–19 in Dales Creek: 2.8% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Mount Egerton: 1.8% males, 1.5% females
- 10–14 in Dales Creek: 4.6% males, 5.1% females; 10–14 in Mount Egerton: 2.4% males, 4.2% females
- 5–9 in Dales Creek: 4.6% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Mount Egerton: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 0–4 in Dales Creek: 1.0% males, 4.8% females; 0–4 in Mount Egerton: 2.7% males, 5.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $535
- First area, 2016: $711
- First area, 2021: $917
- Second area, 2011: $468
- Second area, 2016: $540
- Second area, 2021: $774
- First area, 2011: $1,212
- First area, 2016: $1,485
- First area, 2021: $1,966
- Second area, 2011: $959
- Second area, 2016: $1,047
- Second area, 2021: $1,613
- First area, 2011: $1,524
- First area, 2016: $1,766
- First area, 2021: $2,269
- Second area, 2011: $870
- Second area, 2016: $1,312
- Second area, 2021: $2,229
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $369
- First area, 2021: $271
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $270
- First area, 2011: $1,500
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,506
- Second area, 2016: $1,257
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Dales Creek with nearby areas
Compare Mount Egerton with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Dales Creek vs Mount Egerton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL222014/dales-creek/vs/UCL222057/mount-egerton