Compare
Creswick vs Mount Egerton
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 30 km apart · Creswick profile · Mount Egerton profile
Creswick Mount Egerton
Creswick and Mount Egerton (L) are nearby Victorian areas with very different profiles. Creswick is a more established hub where residents are far older, with a typical age of 51 and 30.5% aged 65 or over. It is also more accessible, with a walkability score of 5.7 (somewhat walkable) and 46% of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services. In contrast, Mount Egerton (L) is more car-dependent, with a score of 3.5. It has a younger feel and higher incomes, with a typical weekly household income of $1,613 compared to $1,072 in Creswick.
Both areas are similar in their housing size, with around 77% of homes having three or more bedrooms, and they share nearly identical typical weekly rents of about $270. However, many other gaps have widened since 2011. The difference in home ownership has grown, with outright ownership now far higher in Creswick. Similarly, the gap in employment has increased, with a much higher share of adults working or looking for work in Mount Egerton (L).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,355
- First area, 2016: 3,422
- First area, 2021: 2,794
- Second area, 2011: 218
- Second area, 2016: 461
- Second area, 2021: 322
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Creswick: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 85+ in Mount Egerton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Creswick: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 80–84 in Mount Egerton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Creswick: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Mount Egerton: 2.4% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Creswick: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 70–74 in Mount Egerton: 0.9% males, 3.3% females
- 65–69 in Creswick: 3.7% males, 4.6% females; 65–69 in Mount Egerton: 4.5% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Creswick: 3.8% males, 4.6% females; 60–64 in Mount Egerton: 5.6% males, 1.5% females
- 55–59 in Creswick: 3.0% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Mount Egerton: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 50–54 in Creswick: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Mount Egerton: 3.9% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Creswick: 3.6% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Mount Egerton: 4.7% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Creswick: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Mount Egerton: 2.7% males, 5.0% females
- 35–39 in Creswick: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Mount Egerton: 5.0% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Creswick: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Mount Egerton: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Creswick: 1.6% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Mount Egerton: 1.2% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Creswick: 1.8% males, 1.4% females; 20–24 in Mount Egerton: 3.9% males, 1.2% females
- 15–19 in Creswick: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Mount Egerton: 1.8% males, 1.5% females
- 10–14 in Creswick: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Mount Egerton: 2.4% males, 4.2% females
- 5–9 in Creswick: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Mount Egerton: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 0–4 in Creswick: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Mount Egerton: 2.7% males, 5.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $404
- First area, 2016: $568
- First area, 2021: $589
- Second area, 2011: $468
- Second area, 2016: $540
- Second area, 2021: $774
- First area, 2011: $714
- First area, 2016: $959
- First area, 2021: $1,072
- Second area, 2011: $959
- Second area, 2016: $1,047
- Second area, 2021: $1,613
- First area, 2011: $921
- First area, 2016: $1,237
- First area, 2021: $1,491
- Second area, 2011: $870
- Second area, 2016: $1,312
- Second area, 2021: $2,229
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $285
- First area, 2021: $275
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $270
- First area, 2011: $867
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,506
- Second area, 2016: $1,257
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Creswick with nearby areas
Compare Mount Egerton with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Creswick vs Mount Egerton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215028/creswick/vs/UCL222057/mount-egerton